Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

SONLEMA INCLicense 1976106454 citations on this visit
4 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20250522152714 . LPA met staff #1 (S1) Gayane Kirakosyan who was present at the facility at the time of the visit and granted access to facility. Staff #2 (S2) Levon Torosyan arrived later at the facility and contacted the Administrator. The Administrator refused to come to the facility and informed LPA that a designee will come to the facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit to the Administrator. At 11:00 AM, the designee Hovik Odabashyan, arrived and LPA explained the reason for the visit to the designee. During the visit, LPA was informed that S1 has been working at the facility as of 05/19/25 and occasionally comes and helps with the facility and S2 is working on a regular shift Monday through Friday from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM as of 03/12/2025; however, both staff are not fingerprint cleared or associated to the facility. Furthermore, the assigned designee who arrived at the facility also was not associated to the facility and denied any future association to the facility. Additionally, interview with one (1) out of one (1) resident confirmed that both staff are working on daily basis at the facility since the time of their admission as of 05/18/2025. Moreover, LPA reviewed LIS and did not observe S1, S2 fingerprint cleared or associated to the facility. LPA observed that the designee is being fingerprint cleared; however, not associated with the facility. LPA also observed that the Administrator lacks qualification by not demonstrating the requirements for appropriate care and supervision of the residents in care. During the course of investigating complaint # 31-AS-20250522152714, the facility also did not have any records for Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) at the facility. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies are cited and noted on LIC 809D. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights explained and copy of report signed and delivered.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(2)Type A

    87355(e)(2) Criminal Record Clearance. Prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility, all individuals subject to a criminal record review shall request a transfer of a criminal record clearance from another facility or Trustline. This requriement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, and LIS personnel record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not associating the Administrator designee to the facility since 05/19/2025, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87405(d)(1Type A

    Administrator Qualifications - 87405 (d) The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). If the licensee is also the administrator... (1) Knowledge of the requirements...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, and LPA's observation the licensee failed to ensure to demonstrate knowledge and requirement for approperiate care and supervison of the residents which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the residents in care.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    87506 Resident Records. (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not maintaining a complete facility file for Resident #1 and Resident #2 which posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)(1)Type A

    Criminal record clearance: (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review... (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, and LIS personnel record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by hiring two (2) staff members without fingerprint clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 23, 2025 inspection of SONLEMA INC?

This was a other inspection of SONLEMA INC on May 23, 2025. 4 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SONLEMA INC on May 23, 2025?

Yes, 4 citations were issued (3 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87355(e)(2) Criminal Record Clearance. Prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility, all individua..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.