Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SONLEMA INCLicense 1976106453 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Staff allowed resident in care to leave the facility unassisted. It is alleged that due to facility staff neglect Resident #1 (R1) eloped the facility unassisted. To investigate this allegation LPA reviewed R1's Physician report and was revealed that R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted or unsupervised. Furthermore, LPA conducted an interview with Administrator and S2 and both confirmed that R1 eloped the facility without staff knowledge on 07/05/2025 at around 8:30 AM. Therefore, based on the record review and information gathered through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Staff did not provide medication assistance to resident in care. It is alleged that the facility staff does not provide R1's medication properly. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation and informed LPA that they always provide medication to all the residents in a timely manner without any discrepancy. However, review of R1's medication revealed that the facility was supposed to start R1's prescribed medication Fluoxetine HCL (mental health condition medication) on 06/27/2025. LPA counted R1's medication and it was discovered that five (5) pills were missing from the Fluoxetine HCL bottle. Additionally, LPA reviewed other four (4) prescribed medication of R1's and they were observed to have discrepancies as well. LPA asked the Administrator and the staff for explaining and both staff could not provide any answers. Therefore, based on the medication record review, interviews, and observation this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Staff cannot properly communicate with residents in care. It was alleged that the facility staff do not speak English and is hard to communicate with residents in care. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who admitted that S1 does not speak English; however, uses an application through their personal cellular telephone to communicate with the residents in care for their basic needs. Furthermore, LPA conducted an interview and concluded that one (1) out of one (1) staff was not able to communicate in English with the residents of which the majority speak English. Moreover, interviews with three (3) out of five (5) residents confirmed that they have trouble communicating with staff for their basic needs. Lastly, during todays visit LPA used Focus Language International Inc Telephone-Based Interpreter service to conduct an interview with S1 due to language barrier. Based on interviews and LPA's observation this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Deficiencies issued and appeal rights explained and given. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(d)(3)Type B

    87411-Personnel Requirements - General(d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have........effective job performance:(3) Skill and knowledge required to..care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents.This was not met as evidence by: Based on the interview, the administrator did not have staff available to communicat in English with residents in care which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.

  • 87464(f)(1)Type A

    87464(f)(1) Basic ServicesBasic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Interviews with the Administrator, staff, and file reviews. Lack of staff supervision resulting in the elopement of residents in care.This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(c)(2)Type A

    87465- Incidental Medical and Dental Care: c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing... 2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above innot assuring that R1's prescribed medications were given as prescribed, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 16, 2025 inspection of SONLEMA INC?

This was a complaint inspection of SONLEMA INC on July 16, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SONLEMA INC on July 16, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411-Personnel Requirements - General(d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have........effective job ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.