Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interviews with Administrator revealed the room for R1 was held from 01/18/22, until 02/06/22 in which it was informed by the family member, that R1 would not be returning back to facility. A prorated amount of $3450.00 was issued by check, dated 02/09/22 and mailed to the address listed of the Power of Attorney (POA) on 02/10/22. Administrator provided LPA with copies of text messages. LPA observed Text messages between Administrator and Family Member in which the Administrator provided a screens shot of the check, and Invoice as proof of attempted mailed check. LPA compared the address in which the check was mailed, to the address listed for POA, check was mailed as it was listed. LPA observed in text message screen shot, an envelope addressed to the POA with a yellow label dated 02/17/22 indicating “Return to Sender No Such Number, Unavailable to Forward.” Administrator stated that they use a Po box which is listed as the sender and did not see that the check was returned until 02/23/22. Observation of Text messages between Administrator and family member were observed of Administrator asking the family member for a correct address to re issue the check. Administrator stated that they have not received a response from R1’s POA, or Family member for use of a correct address. Administrator stated they are not intentionally trying to withhold refund. Based on LPA Interviews, Record Review, and Observation the Department finds that “Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.” An exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 3, 2022 inspection of EMERALD ISLE ASSISTED LIVING #2?

This was a complaint inspection of EMERALD ISLE ASSISTED LIVING #2 on March 3, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to EMERALD ISLE ASSISTED LIVING #2 on March 3, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.