Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

I N VESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegations: Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care. Staff did not assist the resident with obtaining medical care. The details of this complaint allege resident #1 (R1) sustained an unexplained injury while in care and that staff failed to assist the resident with obtaining medical care. The complainant states she observed (R1) with a swollen arm/wrist on 07/06/22 during an outing with family members. The complainant alleges the unexplained injury occurred while (R1) is under care at this facility. The department interviewed (R1) who claims the staff provides adequate care services. (R1) asserts he has no concerns for his health or safety while being cared for by staff. (R1) does not recall how he injured his left wrist. In an interview with witness #1 (W1), the power of attorney for (R1) states these allegations are false. (W1) reports she was with (R1) during the family outing on 07/06/22 and did not observe (R1's) left wrist to have been severely swollen. (W1) argues due to (R1's) medical condition, a flare-up and swelling in the joints may occur. (W1) states this condition might have been caused by (R1's) food consumption for lunch or dinner during his outing. (R1) is on a special diet. (W1) declares the swelling did not happen while at the facility, but while he was out with family members. Interviews with staff #1-5 (S1-S5) reported that they did not observe any swelling or injuries on (R1's) wrist before his departure with family members. Interviews with residents #2-#5 (R2-R5) and witnesses #2-#5 (W2-W5) did not know any residents with unexplained injuries. (R2-R5) and (W2-W5) expressed the staff provides adequate care and supervision. The complainant asserts staff did not assist (R1) with medical care and did not make medical records for (R1) accessible for review. The Department interviewed (R1) who does not recall receiving medical attention for his wrist on 07/06/22. However, medical records from Kaiser Permanente Hospital revealed that (R1) received immediate medical attention on 07/06/22 and that the exam and imaging suggest that there are no serious injuries. Interviews with (S1-S5) verified that (R1's) power of attorney (W1) was notified immediately of the incident when (R1) returned from the family outing and was taken to the emergency for medical observation. Incidents reports and email communications verified the authorizing representative was notified on 07/06/22. Interviews with (R2-R5) and (W2-W5) expressed that they had no issues with the staff seeking medical attention for residents promptly. EVALUATION REPORT CONTINUES (S2) claims that medical records were not made accessible to the complainant and that only the release of resident medical information is made available to the authorized representative for (R1). A review of service records indicates that (W1) power of attorney is the only authorized representative for (R1) on file. The complainant added concerns for (R1's) hygiene and claims that during an in-person visit on 07/07/22, she noticed (R1) seemed unkempt and did not appear to be groomed. During the investigation, the Department observed (R1) in a presentable appearance. (R1) appeared well groomed and did not exude an unpleasant odor. A review of (R1's) daily monitoring of ADLs and progress notes indicates that (R1) is being cared for on an hourly basis. According to (W1) power of attorney for (R1) claims this is all a misunderstanding. (W1) describes that there is an ongoing litigation with family members over (R1's) guardianship. Based on information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, analysis of (R-1)'s service records, and interviews conducted, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned in this complaint. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview conducted with Ginger Enriquez, and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 20, 2022 inspection of CARSON SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of CARSON SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING on July 20, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CARSON SENIOR ASSISTED LIVING on July 20, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.