complaint·August 8, 2022

The investigation reveals the following: In regard to “Staff failed to prevent the sale of drugs at facility”. The details of this allegation state that drug dealing is occurring in the facility. Administrator confirmed that the facility has not seen or heard of drug dealings in the facility. Administrator stated that there is a no tolerance for illegal drugs in the facility per house rules. 2/2 staff stated they have not seen or heard of drug dealings in the facility. 4/5 residents stated they have not seen or heard of staff or clients dealing drugs in the facility. 1/5 residents stated roommate deals drugs in the facility. Room mate was interviewed and declined the allegation. The investigation reveals the following: In regard to " Staff failed to prevent drug usage on the premises ". The details of this allegation state that R1 roommate (R2) use drugs in the facility. Administrator confirmed there are no drug usage in the facility. 2/2 stated they have not seen residents use drugs in the facility.4/5 residents confirmed that they have not seen other residents use drugs in the facility. 1/5 residents stated room mate use drugs in the facility. R2 denied drug usage The investigation reveals the following: In regard to “Client masturbating in front of other clients”. The details of this allegation state that R2 masturbate in front of R1. Administrator stated the facility have not received any complaints from residents regarding the above allegation. Administrator confirmed R1 family member informed administrator of concerns and the facility investigated the incident. Administrator spoke to R2 and R2 declined the allegation. Administrator has now moved R1 to a private room. 2/2 staff stated they have not received complaints from residents regarding the above allegation. 4/5 clients stated that they have not witness other residents masturbating in front of them. 1/5 residents stated roommate was watching porn and masturbated to which he also watched the porn on roommates TV. R2 decline the allegation. Based on LPA's interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Evangeline De Casa and a copy of this record provided.