complaint·April 18, 2025

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: “Illegal eviction”, it is being alleged that R1 is getting illegally evicted. Records reviewed revealed the following: On 03/18/2025, R1 received a 30-day Eviction Notice. On 3/18/2025 around 2:38 PM, the department received a 30-day Eviction Notice dated 03/18/2025 for R1 via email from Administrator, Gradney. On 3/25/2025, the department had a conversation with Administrator, Gradney informing them of the changes they need to make to the 30-day Eviction Notice for the notice to be in compliance with California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 regulations. On 04/08/2025, the Administrator, Gradney emailed the department an updated 30-day Eviction Notice. On 04/10/2025, the department informed the Administrator, Gradney of the updates the 30-day Eviction Notice requires to be in compliance with CCR Title 22 regulations. On 04/10/2025 around 11:59 PM, the Administrator, Gradney emailed the updated 30-day Eviction Notice. On 04/14/2025, the department informed the Administrator, Gradney that the 30-day Eviction Notice appears to be in compliance with CCR Title 22 regulations. Moreover, R1’s unusual incident reports demonstrate a pattern of aggression toward residents, staff, and the general public. Furthermore, the licensee followed CCR Title 22 by sending a written report of eviction notices within five days. Based on conversations with the Administrator, Gradney and records reviewed this allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with the