Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SUNRISE OF BEVERLY HILLSLicense 198320179
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Resident received unexplained bruises while in care. It’s being alleged that a resident sustained bruising while in care. The investigation revealed the following: During interviews with the staff, 4 out of 4 denied the allegation to be true. S1 denies the allegation occurred at the facility. “R1 was sent to UCLA psych. Eventually, the hospital was able to stabilize them. The family was extremely satisfied with our services. We were surprised by the complaint because even the family stated the bruising came from the hospital visit.” S2 states, I spent a lot of time as R1’s 1 to 1. We are trained to sooth residents when they are in crisis. We are trained to back away. We don’t do restraints here.” S3 states, “never witness anyone grabbing or restraining R1. If I did, I would have definitely reported that. We have to report any little thing here.” During interviews with the residents the following was revealed: 4 out of 5 residents denied the allegation to be true. 1 resident was unavailable for an interview. R2-5 unanimously all agreed that they enjoy living at the facility, denies ever being mistreated, restrained or handled in a way that may cause injury. R2 states, “well I like it very much obviously. I’ve been here almost 8 years. The staff treat me well, oh my God yes. If there is anything I can say I really love it here.” R4 states, “I’ve been here 10.5 years. I enjoy it. They are all my angels. They help me whenever I need it. The staff, they are all very kind to me. I think it’s a wonderful place.” During an interview with W1 they state, “I never had any concerns about Sunrise. They took really good care of my relative. I have no particular case against Sunrise. They took really good care of R1. The bruises came from the hospital restraining R1 during their time there.” During a review of the medication administration record, LPA observed resident was on a medication that made bruising easier and may have taken longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. During a review of progress notes there was no indication of bruising prior to resident leaving for the hospital. When resident returned back to the facility it was noted that resident had a small bruise on right arm with skin intact. Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 30, 2022 inspection of SUNRISE OF BEVERLY HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of SUNRISE OF BEVERLY HILLS on March 30, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SUNRISE OF BEVERLY HILLS on March 30, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.