Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PALOS VERDES CARE COTTAGELicense 1983203052 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure the facility's smoke and other detectors are properly operating”, it is being alleged that the facility’s emergency alert system is in disrepair. During today’s inspection, LPA observed seven (7) smoke/carbon monoxide detectors. LPA observed that three (3) out of seven (7) smoke detectors in the house were in disrepair. From 10:00AM to 11:10AM, LPA interviewed R1, W1, and S1-S2. Interviews revealed the following: S1 and S2 have denied the allegation has taken place, while W1 agreed to have never observed staff testing the smoke alarms. Based on LPA's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6) is being cited. Please see LIC9099-D. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure passageways are free from obstruction”, it is being alleged that the outdoor walkways of the facility are obstructed. During today's inspection, LPA observed two (2) outdoor walkways. From 10:00AM to 11:10AM, LPA interviewed R1, W1, and S1-S2. Interviews revealed the following: R1, W1, S1 and S2 have denied the allegation has taken place. S1 has confirmed the Eastern walkway as the main exit. Although nobody interviewed has confirmed the allegation has taken place, LPA's observed one (1) out of two (2) outdoor walkways as being obstructed. Based on LPA's observation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6) is being cited. Please see LIC9099-D. There have been two (2) deficiencies cited during today's inspection, please see LIC9099-D. An exit interview was held with staff one, Ma Salvacion "Salve" Medina (S1), and a copy of the facilities' appeal rights, two (2) deficiencies, and this report have been provided. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation “Staff do not ensure the facility is in good repair”, it is being alleged that the facilities’ aluminum wiring is in disrepair which has resulted in a melted electrical outlet. From 10:00AM to 11:10AM, LPA interviewed R1, W1 and S1-S2. Interviews revealed the following: R1, W1 and S2 have denied the allegation has taken place, while S1 has confirmed that on Tuesday, 06/03/25, maintenance staff have come to replace the outlet due to disrepair, which indicates the facility wishes to provide safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to residents in care. During today’s inspection, LPA did not observe any of the facilities' lights dimming nor any other electrical concerns and LPA tested the working outlet which charged LPA's laptop computer. Based on LPA's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated . Regarding this allegation, there have been zero (0) deficiencies cited. An exit interview was held with staff one, Ma Salvacion "Salve" Medina (S1), and a copy of the facilities' appeal rights, two (2) deficiencies, and this report have been provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87203Type B

    87203 - Fire SafetyAll facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic.This has not been met as evidenced by:Based on LPA's observation the licensee did not ensure the facility remains within the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal in rooms 1, 2, 3 to ensure that control equipment produces an alarm signal, and are in working condition, to protect life and property, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.

  • 87307(d)(6)Type B

    87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction.This has not been met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation, the licensee did not ensure that the facilities' Eastern walkway remains free of obstruction, which poses a potential health risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 6, 2025 inspection of PALOS VERDES CARE COTTAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of PALOS VERDES CARE COTTAGE on June 6, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PALOS VERDES CARE COTTAGE on June 6, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87203 - Fire SafetyAll facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marsh..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.