Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

STERLING SENIOR LIVING 3License 198320308
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation #1: Staff gave resident medication not prescribed. The details of the complaint alleged staff chemically restrained resident #1 (R1) by administering a non-prescribed medication. The complainant reported sometime in October 15 through 30, 2023 a staff gave Lorazepam to (R1) during the early morning hours of 12 am – 6 am when (R1) experienced restlessness and agitation. The complainant did not observe the staff administering the Lorazepam to (R1) and that it was only information provided by another individual. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to this facility on 09/29/22 according to the facilities’ Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601 dated: 09/28/22. (R1) voluntarily terminated residency on 11/3/23. A review of (R1’s) Medication Administration Record (MAR) (dated: 10/01/23 – 10/31/23) of (R1’s) medications has remained consistent. The (MAR) for (R1) noted medications were taken daily, and no medications were missed or refused. There were no non-prescribed medications listed by staff identified as Lorazepam or Ativan noted on the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record LIC 622 (dated: 11/08/23). There were (7) of (11) medications prescribed by (R1’s) medical physicians such as Risperidone, Sertraline, Melatonin, Trazodone, Buspirone, and Memantine all have side effects that may result in a state of being relaxed, sleepy or calmness according to the National Institute of Health (ref.NIH.gov). On 11/15/23 between 10:01 am and 10:29 am, the Department interviewed the family representative of (R1) witness #1 (W1) who confirmed that (R1) was prescribed Lorazepam but became suspicious when (W1) was informed by a former staff that had issued Lorazepam to sedate (R1). (W1) was unable to determine the date of the alleged incident and stated that (W1) did not witness this activity only through information provided by the former staff. On 11/15/23 between 10:30 am – 12:00 pm, the Department interviewed (3) out of (3) staff #2-#4 (S2-S4) claimed to not know any staff providing non-prescribed medications to any of the residents. (S2-S4) claimed only what is listed on the (MAR) or (LIC 622) is administered to residents. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) On 11/15/23 between 12:00 pm – 12:22 pm, the Department interviewed the former staff witness #2 (W2) the informant to (W1) with this information. (W2) claimed to have been informed by staff #1(S1) that Lorazepam was issued to (R1) when (R1) was agitated and restless during early morning hours. (W2) stated no other witnesses overheard this conversation and were unable to verify the date or time when given the information from (S1). (W2) confirms that information was only given to (W1) and no other individuals were made aware of the matter. On 11/15/23 between 1:02 pm and 1:23 pm, the Department interviewed staff #1 (S1) who denied this alleged act and claimed this accusation was false. (S1) stated no nonprescribed medications such as Lorazepam or Ativan were ever given to (R1). (S1) denied ever informing any individuals of this matter. (S1) claimed that only residents in hospice care are prescribed such medication. (S1) claimed to be fully trained in administering or delivering prescription medications and follows what is on the listed on (LIC 622). On 11/15/23 between 2:00 pm – 2:47 pm, the Department interviewed (2) out of (4) residents #2-#3 (R2-R3) who reported needing assistance with medication management and have not encountered issues nor have been provided medications that are not prescribed by their medical physician. (R4-R5) were interviewed but were unable to fully participate in conversation due to their health conditions. On 11/15/23 between 3:02 pm – 4:15 pm, the Department interviewed family representatives witnesses #3-#4 (W3-W4) for residents #4-#5 (R4-R5) were complimentary of the staff and reported to have no concerns for the care and supervision of residents at this facility. (W3-W4) claimed there have been no medication errors that have been witnessed or reported by any facility staff. On 11/15/23 between 8:44 am – 9:02 am the Department interviewed facility administrator witness #5 (W5) who verified (R1) was admitted on 11/09/23 with no Lorazepam or Ativan was listed on the medication list and no refills included such medication. On 11/15/23 between 9:03 am – 9:24 am the Department interviewed resident #1 (R1) who had no comments. (R1) was unable to fully participate in a conversation due to (R1’s) health condition. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) The Department reviewed personnel records for staff #1 (S1) and verified that medication training was completed by staff. Biological Laboratory urine drug screening test results for (R1) conducted 10/23/23 revealed negative for Lorazepam or Ativan. Based on the information gathered, an inspection of the facility, observation, and interviews conducted, an analysis of records reviewed, the Department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation, did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Arnold Mendoza, and copies of the reports were provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 9, 2023 inspection of STERLING SENIOR LIVING 3?

This was a complaint inspection of STERLING SENIOR LIVING 3 on December 9, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to STERLING SENIOR LIVING 3 on December 9, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.