Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BRITTANY HOUSELicense 198320417
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Admissions Agreement dated 7/3/2024, Personal property valuables list dated 7/3/2024 , Staff and Resident rosters for 6/2024 and 4/2025, LPA also conducted interviews with Staff 1- Staff 10 (S1–S10) and Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10), in addition to observations made during the tour of the facility. Investigation revealed the following: 1 Allegation: Staff handled residents in a rough manner which resulted in injuries On 5/12/2025 at 11:00 AM, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). Of all the staff interviewed 10 out of 10 staff interviewed stated residents have not been handled in a rough manner that could have resulted in injuries. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the interviews conducted 2 residents stated staff members have not handled them in a rough manner causing injury. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. 2 Allegation: Staff inappropriately restrained resident On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). Of all the staff interviewed 10 out of 10 staff members stated residents have not been inappropriately restrained in any way. LPA requested any special incident reports during the visit, and none could be provided because there were no incidents to report regarding restraining residents. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the interviews conducted 2 residents stated staff members have not restrained them in any way. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. Continued... 3 Allegation: Staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated staff does provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents. LPA also attempted to interview Residents 1 – Resident 10 (R1–R10). LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated that staff members have provide a safe and comfortable environment. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. During the tour of the facility LPA observed the residents to be in a safe and comfortable environment and no health and safety concerns were observed. 4 Allegation: Staff did not provide residents with privacy On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 -Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated staff does provide residents with privacy while assisting with showers and any ADL's requiring privacy. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated that staff members have provide them with privacy. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. During the tour of the facility LPA didn’t observe any residents’ rights being violated. 5 Allegation: Staff mismanaged residents’ medication On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated staff has not mismanaged residents’ medication. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated staff members have provided them with their medications daily. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. On 5/12/2025 LPA observed R1 Medication Administration Records (MARS) and based on LPA observations it appeared that R1s medications had been administered as prescribed by their physicians. Continued... 6 Allegation: Residents are being left unattended for extended periods On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated residents are not left unattended for extended periods of time. Staff stated there is no records of residents being changed however residents are checked on every 2-3 hours to ensure their incontinence issues are addressed or as needed. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated that staff members help them with their Assistance with Daily Living (ADLS) as needed or when asked. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. During the tour of the facility, it appeared that residents were getting incontinence assistance from staff members. 7 Allegation: Staff did not provide adequate food service On 5/12/2025 LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated the residents are provided adequate food service based on their dietary needs or modified diets. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated they get three (3) meals and snacks daily the remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. On 5/12/2025, LPA observed the residents in care being fed and eating a balanced meal for breakfast -hot cereal, eggs, bacon and toast, Lunch- Baked pork chops, cornbread, mashed potatoes, and mixed veggies. On 5/22/2025 LPA toured the kitchen and observed there to be a 5-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food items. Lunch served tuna casserole, green salad, green beans and cornbread, water, juice and coffee. There was a menu available for review that reflected meals served. 8 Allegation: Medications are not being stored properly On 5/12/2025 LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), 10 out of 10 staff members stated the medication room is locked when not in use. LPA observed the residents’ medications to be stored properly in the medication room locked in drawers inaccessible to the residents. LPA also observed the Medication Technicians (MEDTECHS) using their keys to open the medication drawers during the random audit of records/medications. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated they are not sure about medications being stored properly. Continued .. 9 Allegation: Residents are not being changed in a timely manner. On 5/12/2025, LPA conducted interviews with Staff 1 - Staff 10 (S1–S10), Residents 1 - Resident 10 (R1–R10). 10 out of 10 staff members stated staff has not left residents unattended for extended periods of time. Staff stated there is no records of residents being changed however residents are checked on every 2-3 hours to ensure their incontinence issues are addressed. LPA was unable to interview R1. LPA attempted to interview Residents 2 – Resident 9 (R2-R9). Of the 10 residents, 2 stated that staff members help them with their Assistance with Daily Living (ADLS) as needed or when asked. The remaining 8 residents were unable to engage in a clear conversation. During the tour of the facility, it appeared that residents were getting incontinence assistance from staff members. Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. While the allegations may be valid or have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether the alleged violations took place or did not. Therefore, the allegations are determined Unsubstantiated . An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Joel Niblett- Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 4, 2025 inspection of BRITTANY HOUSE?

This was a complaint inspection of BRITTANY HOUSE on June 4, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BRITTANY HOUSE on June 4, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.