Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BRITTANY HOUSELicense 198320417
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the Allegation : Staff did not maintain facility sanitary’. This complaint alleged that the facility staff did not change R1 bed that had feces in the sheets. LPA Calderon noted staff cleaning the facility. LPA Calderon noted staff changing bed sheets. Records review indicate the following: Reviewed housekeeping schedule for (dated 01/2026) staff cleaning from 6:30 am to 3pm every day. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that R1 was only in the facility for 3 days and transferred to a new facility. S1 indicates that staff clean rooms every day and change sheets 3 times per week or when needed. 7 out of 7 staff deny the allegation. R1 could not be interviewed as R1 no longer lives in the facility. 11 out of 12 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff did not maintain facility sanitary” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the Allegation : Facility smells malodorous. This complaint alleged that the facility common areas and rooms smelled. LPA Calderon noted staff cleaning the facility. LPA Calderon noted staff changing bed sheets. LPA Calderon did not smell any odors in the rooms or common areas. Records review indicate the following: Reviewed housekeeping schedule for (dated 01/2026) staff cleaning from 6:30 am to 3pm every day. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that R1 was only in the facility for 3 days and transferred to a new facility. S1 indicates that staff clean rooms every day and change sheets 3 times per week or when needed. 7 out of 7 staff deny the allegation. R1 could not be interviewed as R1 no longer lives in the facility. 11 out of 12 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “facility smells malodorous” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the Allegation : Staff or residents smoking marijuana’. This complaint alleged that the facility staff and residents smoke marijuana inside the facility. LPA Calderon noted staff cleaning the facility. LPA Calderon noted staff changing bed sheets. LPA Calderon did not smell smoke or the smell of marijuana inside the facility. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that it is against company policy for staff to smoke marijuana at work and no staff would be smoking inside the facility. 7 out of 7 staff deny the allegation. R1 could not be interviewed as R1 no longer lives in the facility. 11 out of 12 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff or resident smoking marijuana inside the facility” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator Joel Niblett (S1).

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type B

    87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee failed to ensure a sufficient number of competent staff to meet R1’s needs. R1’s foot was swollen for several weeks, no one followed up with hospital visits, and ultimately R1’s toe became infected and had to be amputated. This poses a potential health risk to residents in care.

  • 87466Type A

    87466 Observation of the Resident. The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental… functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When…deterioration …are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviewed, the licensee failed to ensure that appropriate assistance was provided to R1 when changes in their physical condition were found (swelling in foot and toe) resulting in the toe being amputated. Which posed a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of the resident in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87211(a)(B)(D)Type B

    87211(a)(B)(D) Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department...(B) Any serious injury... occurring while the resident is under facility supervision. (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety, or health of any resident... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The facility failed to submit written report associated with the incident for R1 that resulted in hospitalization and amputation of R1s toe. The facility did not have proof of certified confirmations that an LIC 624 was faxed to CCL. This violation poses a potential health, safety, or personal-rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87405(b)(2)Type B

    87405(b)(2) Administrator - Qualifications and Duties. (b)The administrator of a facility or facilities shall have the responsibility and authority to carry out the policies of the licensee. (2) Knowledge of and ability to conform to the applicable laws, rules and regulations. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the Licensee/Administrator failed to adhere to Title 22 regulations, by properly ensuring facility staff were providing appropriate care for R1 in accordance with Title 22 regulations, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 22, 2026 inspection of BRITTANY HOUSE?

This was a complaint inspection of BRITTANY HOUSE on January 22, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BRITTANY HOUSE on January 22, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.