Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MONTOAK ONELicense 198320425
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the Allegation : Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision. This complaint alleged that the facility staff did not have staff working on 01/04/2026. LPA Calderon and S1 toured the facility. LPA Calderon noted resident coming and going. LPA Calderon noted 3 staff working and there were no negative interactions between staff and resident noted. Records review indicate the following: Reviewed incident report (dated 01/04/2026), report indicates that R1 complained of not feeling safe and called the police. Police arrived and did not find any issues. The Physician report (dated 06/10/2024) indicates that R1 has no cognitive health issues. LIC500 indicates that there is day, night and weekend staff working. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that there are 2 staff that work in the front house and 1 staff that work in the back house. S1 indicates that S1 family live on the property for any issues. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 indicates that on weekends there are no staff living or working in the back house. R1 indicates that R1 did not feel safe and called the police. R1 indicates that the police did not find any staff working. R2 could not be interviewed as R2 moved out of the facility. 2 out of 4 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff do not provide adequate care and supervision” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the Allegation : Staff did not communicate effectively with the residents. This complaint alleged that the facility staff did not speak English to residents in care. LPA Calderon toured the facility and noted staff speaking to residents in English. LPA Calderon did not notice any negative interactions between staff and residents. Records reviewed indicate the following: Reviewed incident report (dated 12/20/2025, 12/29/2025 and 01/04/2026), reports indicate that R1 had combative relations with staff. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that R1 was combative with staff and advised S1 that R1 did not feel safe in the facility. S1 indicates that staff speak English and communicate with residents in care. S2-S3 interviewed with LPA Calderon in English. S2-S3 primary language is Spanish. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 indicates that the staff hired by the facility do not speak English and cannot communicate with residents in care. R2 cannot be interviewed due to R1 being moved to another facility. 2 out of 4 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff do not communicate effectively with the residents” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the Allegation : Staff are not properly trained. This complaint alleged that the facility staff do not train staff that work for the facility. Records reviewed indicate the following: Reviewed training certificate for S1-S3. Training provided to staff CPR/First aid, Medication assistance. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that the facility provides training to staff on an annual basis. S1 indicates that all staff must have training to work for the facility. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 indicates that staff are not trained and should not take care of residents. R2 cannot be interviewed due to R1 being moved to another facility. 2 out of 4 residents deny the allegation. Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff are not properly trained” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was provided to the Administrator Najma Shaheen (S1).

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 14, 2026 inspection of MONTOAK ONE?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTOAK ONE on January 14, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MONTOAK ONE on January 14, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.