Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with laundry service. The details of the complaint allege that staff improperly stored soiled garments within the resident’s closet. LPA Shirley reviewed PAL Approach Chart and Service Plan for R1, July 2024 through December 2024. During review, LPA Shirley observed that R1’s laundry day was Fridays. LPA Shirley observed the initials of the caregivers providing the laundry service for the week and that laundry service was consistent. LPA Shirley did not observe soiled garments in the closet as R1 transferred out of this facility on 12/27/25. LPA Shirley interviewed staff-1 thru staff-10 (S-1 thru S-10). LPA asked, how often does staff wash the resident’s clothes. Of those interviewed, 10 out of 10 staff answered twice a week. LPA interviewed Resident-2 thru Resident-10 (R-2 thru R-10). LPA asked, how often does staff clean your clothes. Of those interviewed, 7 out of 9 answered once a week, and 2 had other answers. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with housekeeping services The details of the complaint allege that R1’s room was unclean. Per review of the Admissions Agreement signed 5/30/14, Belmont Village will provide weekly housekeeping services for the Con'd on 9099-C the residents. LPA Shirley reviewed PAL Approach Chart and Service Plan for R1, July 2024 through December 2024. During review, LPA Shirley observed that R1’s housekeeping day was Fridays. During review, LPA Shirley observed that there were specific areas of R1’s room that were tidied up daily. Per the Executive Director’s interview, the rooms are deep cleaned weekly. LPA Shirley observed the initials of the staff members providing housekeeping services consistently. LPA Shirley did not observe an unkept room as R1 transferred out of this facility on 12/27/25. LPA Shirley interviewed staff-1 thru staff-10 (S-1 thru S-10). LPA asked, how often does the housekeeping staff clean the resident’s rooms. Of those interviewed, 9 out of 10 staff answered once a week, one answered 2 or 3 times a week. LPA interviewed Resident-2 thru Resident-10 (R-2 thru R-10). LPA asked, how often does staff clean your room. Of those interviewed, 3 out of 9 answered once a week, and 6 had other answers. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not assist resident with showering The details of the complaint allege that facility staff stopped giving R1 showers. LPA reviewed R1’s Physicians Report signed, 10/24/23 and observed that R1 was not able to bathe herself. LPA reviewed R1’s assessment dated, 12/12/24. The assessment stated that R1 needed hands Con'd on assistance with showers. LPA Shirley reviewed PAL Approach Chart and Service Plan for R1, July 2024 through December 2024. During review, LPA Shirley observed that R1’s assigned shower days were Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. LPA Shirley observed the initials of the caregivers assisting R1 with her showers and that this service continued until the day R1 moved out 12/27/25. LPA Shirley interviewed staff-1 thru staff-10 (S-1 thru S-10). LPA asked, does staff assist residents with their showering needs. Of those interviewed, 10 out of 10 staff answered yes. LPA interviewed Resident-2 thru Resident-10 (R-2 thru R-10). LPA asked, does staff assist you with your showering needs. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 9 answered that their independent, and 1 resident did not answer. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not ensure facility was maintained sanitary The details of the complaint allege that Belmont Village failed to fulfill the terms of their care agreement as the carpet in R1’s room #205 was unclean. LPA Shirley toured the facility to observe the carpeting in room #205 and observed that the room had been upgraded for the next resident. There was no longer carpet in the room. Room #205 now has vinyl wood flooring. LPA reviewed pictures provided and observed that there was a rug covering a soiled area near where the bed used to be situated. This area was not observed until the resident transferred out 12/27/25. Con'd on 9099-C LPA Shirley interviewed staff-1 thru staff-10 (S-1 thru S-10). LPA asked, does staff maintain a sanitary facility. Of those interviewed, 10 out of 10 staff answered yes. LPA interviewed Resident-2 thru Resident-10 (R-2 thru R-10). LPA asked, does staff maintain a sanitary facility. Of those interviewed, 8 out of 9 answered yes, and 1 resident did not answer. Based on records review, interviews and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegations, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, as a result, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited for these allegations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director, Ralph Balbin.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 24, 2025 inspection of BELMONT VILLAGE RANCHO PALOS VERDES?

This was a complaint inspection of BELMONT VILLAGE RANCHO PALOS VERDES on April 24, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BELMONT VILLAGE RANCHO PALOS VERDES on April 24, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.