Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SOUTHLAND LIVINGLicense 198601962
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff leave resident in bed for prolonged periods of time. It is alleged that R1 reported to have been left in bed for 3 weeks and had not been outside. Per interviews conducted with staff, (5) of (5) staff denied the allegation and stated R1 required a (2) to (4) person assist when transferring, but was not willing to cooperate with staff during the transfers and would throw self back during the assists, making it more difficult to transfer. Staff stated they had no issues with transferring other residents that required the assistance. Per resident interviews, (4) of (5) residents could not corroborate the allegation. After review of R1's Care Plan, it was noted that R1 requires a (2) to (4) person assist to transfer. Per R1's Physician's Report, R1 is non-ambulatory and is unable to transfer out of bed on their own. R1's Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan indicates R1 requires maximum assistance with mobility and transferring in and out of bed/chair. Per Hospice Notes and facility Progress Notes, it was discovered that on 2/05/23, R1 was assisted by facility staff with standing. On 2/10/23, R1 was assisted by (2) facility staff with transferring to chair, but was throwing self back even while being assisted. On 2/22/23, R1 refused to be assisted by facility staff with care. On 03/02/23, assistance with transfer was provided by (3) staff, and R1's guardian was later notified of R1's refusal to care despite being provided with a (2) person assist. On 4/25/23, while R1 was moving out of the facility, R1 had a (4) person assist, and although R1 was able to get up, R1 then refused to be assisted into the car that was picking R1 up. Per interview conducted with R1's hospice agency, and per hospice record review, there was no written order for use of a hoyer lift to assist with R1's transfers, although the hospice care physician only made a verbal recommendation that a hoyer lift could help. The facility is not required to have a hoyer lift, and per interview with Administrator, none of the facility staff are trained to use a hoyer lift due to the facility not using or owning one. There are no residents in the facility who require assistance with transfer by hoyer lift. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 1, 2024 inspection of SOUTHLAND LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SOUTHLAND LIVING on February 1, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SOUTHLAND LIVING on February 1, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.