Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SAKURA GARDENS AT LOS ANGELESLicense 1986021921 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not meet resident’s needs. Regarding allegation, “Staff did not meet resident’s needs,” it is alleged, staff did not provide resident with insulin and diabetic supplies to check sugar. During the investigation, interview with R1 indicates, facility staff did not have their insulin after being transferred from convalescent hospital. R1 reported to staff they were feeling sick and was transported to hospital via ambulance. Review of Special Incident Report dated 11/14/2024, indicates, R1 was assessed by paramedics with Hypoglycemia being high, at 561. Interviews with S1 indicate, facility received the insulin, however, it was not administered. Interview with S2 also confirms, R1 did not receive insulin dose at the facility. Additionally, interviews with DS indicate, R1 was transferred to facility from convalescent home with all their medication, including their insulin. Review of medication inventory lists from facility and convalescent hospital further indicate insulin was included in the medication R1 took to the facility during their transfer from convalescent hospital. Based on LPA’s observations, file and record reviews, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation has been determined to be SUBSTANTIATED . Deficiency cited on LIC 9909-D. Exit interview was conducted with Dennis Robeniol. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided. It is alleged, staff declined to listen to resident and only listened when they asked staff to call the ambulance when they did not feel well. During the investigation, eight out of nine residents interviewed stated, staff are helpful, and they meet their needs in a timely manner. Residents stated staff are nice and they have not experienced any problems during their time at the facility. Staff interviewed stated, staff ensure care and supervision of residents is met by conducting scheduled status checks. There is Life Alert necklace system in place for all residents to ensure they have a way to communicate with staff at any time. During tour of the facility, LPA observed multiple staff providing care and supervision to residents in their rooms and during daily activities throughout the facility. Based on LPA observation, file and record review, and interviews conducted, the allegation listed above could not be corroborated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview conducted with Dennis Robeniol, Executive Director. A copy of the report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    Maintain separate complete record for each resident

    Resident Records 87506(a) Licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility ... readily available to facility staff and to licensing ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on file and record review of R2's MAR logs were incomplete. MAR logs were missing multiple initials for medication required to be administered daily, once or several times a day, which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 876289(b)(1)Type A

    Diabetes 87628(b)(1): (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements by Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall ... : (1) Assisting residents with self-administered medication as specified in Section 87465, Incidental Medical ... Services. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, file and record review, and interviews conducted, Licensee did not provide resident with insulin and diabetic supplies which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 13, 2025 inspection of SAKURA GARDENS AT LOS ANGELES?

This was a complaint inspection of SAKURA GARDENS AT LOS ANGELES on February 13, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SAKURA GARDENS AT LOS ANGELES on February 13, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Resident Records 87506(a) Licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each res..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.