Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

HAPPY HOME CARE FOR ELDERLYLicense 198602403
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. It is alleged resident #1(R1) was kicked out due to their inability to care for the elderly with dementia. On 7/12/21 LPA Flores reviewed R1's file and observed an admission agreement signed on 12/8/21. R1's physician report dated 12/11/20. R1's file contained a letter with effective date 12/22/21 and states "note: Federal regulations require that your transfer or discharge be made for one of the following reasons: the transfer to discharge is appropriate because she wants to move to another place." which does not state any of the elements of an eviction letter or state that facility is requesting resident to move out. R1 moved out on 12/22/20 according to the administrator by R1 family representative's choice. LPA reviewed text messages between R1's representative and administrator and found no evidence of facility requesting R1 to move out of the facility. Based on LPA's file review and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff did not issue a refund . It is alleged facility i s not willing to refund the 2 weeks of prepaid room & board fee. On 7/12/21 LPA Flores reviewed R1's file and observed an admission agreement signed on 12/8/21 and the agree monthly fee is $1069.72. R1 resided at the facility for 14 days, according to administrator the amount for the 14 days totaled and was charge $499.20 and additional charges for an amount of $35.05. Facility provided R1's responsible party a check for the amount of $499.64 dated 12/24/20. Admissions agreement signed and dated on 12/8/20 by responsible party states on section 8 Refund conditions states "other than this, regardless of the condition, the monthly fee paid in any given month will not be refunded." Based on LPA's file review and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED Exit interview was conducted with Kim Jung administrator and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(e)Type A

    Incidental Medical and Dental Care:(e)For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician, on a prescription blank, maintained in the residents file, and a label on the medication. This standard is not met as evidence by: Adm indicated R-1 had ointment to be applied to the wound when R-1 was discharged from the Skilled Nursing Facility to this facility. Adm did not have any supporting evidence for this treatment/medication. Adm provided a prescription order for R-1 dated 04/21/2020 for ointment. There are no medication orders for wound treatment medication prior to 04/21/2020 on file.

  • 87468.1(a)(16)Type A

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (16) To receive or reject medical care or other services. This standard is not met as evidence by: R-1 was admitted to this facility on 03/28/2020 for wound care. Visits were conducted on 04/14/2020, 04/17/2020, 04/21/2020, 04/24/2020, 04/28/2020 and 05/01/2020. Per Adm, R-1 received televisit consultations prior to visits. Adm was only able to provide evidence of communication via text for 04/08/2020, 04/10/2020 and 04/11/2020. Adm was unable to provide evidence on any televisits nor visits prior to 04/08/2020.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 12, 2021 inspection of HAPPY HOME CARE FOR ELDERLY?

This was a complaint inspection of HAPPY HOME CARE FOR ELDERLY on July 12, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to HAPPY HOME CARE FOR ELDERLY on July 12, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.