Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

FIL-AM FOR SENIORSLicense 198602527
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

visit. On 4/11/21, LPA Gonzalez interviewed Licensee Christina Criss and attempted to conduct telephone/ video interviews with R3-4 but was unable to interview the residents due to residents' diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder. LPA attempted a call to R1's daughter (POA), left a voicemail but did not receive a call back. LPA called Goldberg Hospice and spoke to LVN Katherine Santos and requested/ received documents pertaining to R1 via email. LPA also attempted a call to Staff Estrella Lubi and left a voicemail but did not receive a call back. The investigation revealed the following: In regard to allegations, Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care , it is alleged that on 9/26/19 R1 was observed to have red abrasions and bruising on cheeks and bridge of nose. Facility staff stated that R1 kicked facility staff when they were trying to give R1 a shower and facility staff placed a washcloth over R1's face while trying to hold R1 down to finish the shower. On 9/21/19, facility staff reported that R1 had an allergic reaction and also stated that there was no need for hospice agency to come do a check on R1. Interview conducted with Administrator Miclat revealed that on 9/21/19 as Staff Lubi and Zapanta were performing morning care which included a sponge/ towel bath, R1 became resistive and combative at the same time that Staff Lubi was wiping R1's face. Interview conducted with Staff Zapanta revealed that as he was assisting Staff Lubi with R1's morning care, R1 became very combative. He stated that R1 is usually very combative and resistive and R1 will kick and swing arms everywhere. Staff Zapanta stated that as Staff Lubi was wiping R1's face, resident became combative and began moving their face from left to right and when Staff Lubi immediately removed the face towel from R1's face they noticed that R1s face was red and bleeding from nose was observed. Interview with Administrator Miclat also revealed that when hospice agency visited and observed the redness/ bruising on R1's face they questioned Staff Hernandez about the bruising and Staff who has a language barrier could not properly answer the hospice nurse's questions properly and stated to nurse that a staff "put a towel on face" and she believes that is were they confusion arose. Staff Hernandez was not at the facility when the incident occurred. Staff Zapanta denies that a towel was placed over R1's face but that a towel was used to wipe R1's face. Interview with Licensee Criss revealed that R1 is not under hospice care anymore and hospice was terminated on 12/31/19. Mrs. Criss also stated that R1's behavior is more subdued and R1 seems to have acclimated to the facility. Interview conducted with R2's daughter on 10/10/19 revealed that she visits R2 a few times per week and she has not noticed anything that causes any concerns. She stated that staff are very attentive and treat the residents wonderfully. She stated that she visits at different times during the day including the morning and has observed staff to be gentle and patient as they provide care to the residents and are getting them ready for the day. LPA also reviewed Goldberg Hospice notes and observed that R1 was combative and at times and hospice staff had to request for facility staff to assist with R1's bath due to R1's combativeness and flailing of arms and legs. LPA attempted to interview R1-R4 but was not able to properly interview residents as they have a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder. Based on interviews conducted with facility staff, R2's daughter and review of documents, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. For the allegation, Staff inappropriately restraining resident while in care, it is alleged that facility staff used restraints on R1 without a doctor's order. Interviews with Administrator Miclat, Licensee Christina Criss revealed that restraints were not used on R1 and stated that R1 only had a doctor's order for a Lap Buddy which is used to assist R1 with posture while R1 uses wheelchair. Staff deny that any other types of restraints are ever used on R1 or any other resident and if any are used there is a doctor's order on file. During LPA's visit on 10/10/19, LPA did not observe any items that might be used as a restraint. LPA conducted a tour of R1's room and did not notice any restraint devices. LPA also observed R1 sitting on their wheelchair and LPA did observe a Lap buddy. Staff Zapanta denied that any other restraints are used on any residents at facility. Interview with R2's family member also revealed that they have not observed anything that causes any concerns and they are satisfied with the services and treatment that their loved one receives at the facility. Interview conducted with Goldberg Hospice LVN Santos revealed that the only order for R1 on file is for the Lap Buddy and also stated that R1's hospice agency services were terminated on 12/31/19 due to R1 no longer meeting criteria for continued hospice care. R1's symptoms managed with no indication of decline, no weight loss, responding well to nutritional supplements and weight gain. Discharge care plan meeting was conducted with facility staff and R1's family who all verbalized understanding. LPA attempted to interview R1 but was not successful as R1 has a diagnosis of Major Neurocognitive Disorder. Based on the investigation and supporting information obtained, this allegation is not corroborated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Due to measures implemented due to COVID-19, exit interview was conducted with Administrator Toby Miclat via telephone. A copy of the report was sent via email for signature. A hard copy with signature is on file.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 11, 2021 inspection of FIL-AM FOR SENIORS?

This was a complaint inspection of FIL-AM FOR SENIORS on April 11, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to FIL-AM FOR SENIORS on April 11, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.