complaint·April 23, 2025

Regarding the allegation: Licensee initiated the eviction process in retaliation against the resident. It is being alleged that the client received an eviction letter on 04/15/25, to move out of the facility effective date of 05/14/25. On 04/23/25, between 11:00 am to 12:00 pm, LPA Records reviewed of resident #1 R1 indicated that on 04/01/25, the Wellness Director (WD) conducted a reassessment and a needs of service plan that concluded R1 needed a higher level of care and supervision. The Wellness Director indicated that the Power of Attorney (POA) and the family members were aware of the findings of the reassessment and scheduled to meet with the facility on 04/25/25. On 04/23/25, interviewed with the Executive Director, indicated that the facility does not feel they can meet the resident's R1 higher level of care needs; therefore, A 30-day Eviction Notice and supporting documents were faxed to Community Care Licensing on 04/15/25, following the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Based on interviews and records reviewed, there was not sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. There were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted a copy of the report was provided to the Executive Director, Fabiola Marciano.