Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ALTA LOMA GARDENS RESIDENTIAL CARE #2License 1986030032 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

While reviewing medications for current residents at the facility, residents #1, 10 and 11, LPA's discovered no Medication Administration Record (MAR) logs for the month of September 2021 were available. Per Licensee, she had not created the logs but was still dispensing medications to all residents. Upon reviewing their logs for August, LPA's notice a patterned of medication not being dispensed on certain days, in particular Tuesday's and Saturday's. No medication was dispensed on August 14th, 17th, 21st, 24th, 28th, and the 31st according to August's MAR log. Resident #1 was missing medication (LATANOPROST 0.005%) eye drops. Resident #1 had a multi-vitamin and Stool softener (DOCUSATE SODIUM 100mg) in the residents medication with out a physicians order. Per Licensee, they have been giving both to the resident without the order. Resident #10 had several discrepancies of the following medication (LISNOPRIL 40MG, SIMVASTATIN 20MG, NIFEDIPINE 30MG, FUROSEMIDE 20MG, FINASTERIDE 5MG, and CLOPIDOGREL 75MG), all these medications had excessive amount of pills left indicating it was not given as directed. Resident #11 was not given their medication (MELATONIN 3MG) as directed by physicians order. Per August MAR log, the resident was not given the melatonin everyday and the facility had a duplicate prescription that appeared was given to the resident twice a day instead of once a day. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. Please see LIC 9099D An exit interview was conducted with Margarita Stark and copy of this report was provided. Appeal Rights provided. All resident interviewed stated they are changed in a timely manner and have no issues with the time it takes for the staff to change them. Interviews with staff also indicated there is no staffing issues and residents are changed promptly. Per interviews with staff, residents are checked on every 2 hours. Based on interviews conducted there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED An exit interview was conducted with Margarita Stark and copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(c)(2)Type B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, ......provided all of the following requirements are met: (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidence by:Licensee failed to give resident #1, 10 and 11 their medication as prescribed by their physcians orders.

  • 87465(h)(6)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: (A)-(F) This requirement was not met as evidence by:The licensee was giving resident #1 a multi-vitamin and Stool softener (DOCUSATE SODIUM 100mg) with out a physcians order.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 7, 2021 inspection of ALTA LOMA GARDENS RESIDENTIAL CARE #2?

This was a complaint inspection of ALTA LOMA GARDENS RESIDENTIAL CARE #2 on September 7, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ALTA LOMA GARDENS RESIDENTIAL CARE #2 on September 7, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unabl..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.