Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SAVANT OF BURBANK EASTLicense 1986031361 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Resident was hospitalized due to staff neglect. The outcome of LP’s investigation revealed that on 1/3/21, R1 was hospitalized, and his Emergency Department/Hospital course documentation revealed that there was a high probability of sudden, clinically significant, and or life-threatening deterioration due to hypoxia and septic shock which required the highest level of physician preparedness to intervene urgently. Interviews conducted with facility staff and investigatory leads revealed that R1 was not sent out to the hospital when observed by facility staff not at his normal baseline or a change in condition. Interviews conducted were consistent in stating that R1 was not at his normal baseline for days and or up to three weeks, at which and during this time R1 sustained unwitnessed falls and required higher level of care. R1’s change in medical condition was communicated with his POA/Sister and at the request of the POA, facility staff did not transport R1 to the hospital for further evaluation. Facility staff did not ensure that any changes in R1’s medical and physical condition were documented and brought to the attention of R1’s Primary Care Physician. On 1/3/21, R1 was found unresponsive by facility staff, requiring hospitalization. Based on the investigation conducted by LP, there was sufficient evidence found to support the allegation of Resident was hospitalized due to staff neglect. Allegation: Resident developed multiple pressure injuries while in care. During the course of this investigation, LP obtained and reviewed R1’s hospital records and facility file and conducted interviews with investigatory leads. The outcome of the investigation revealed that R1 often refused and did not cooperate with his adult diaper changes. Interviews conducted of staff and review of R1’s facility file revealed that R1 was frequently observed to have a wet, soiled and/or smelly diaper. R1 was observed by staff not at his normal baseline and reported to have a series of unwitnessed falls and no longer able to ambulate and considered bed bound weeks prior to being hospitalized. During the interview with the Social Worker at PSJMC, it was revealed that upon admission to the hospital, R1 was diagnosed with Hypernatremia, Septic Shock, Acute Renal Failure, UTI, malnutrition, dehydration and respiratory failure. R1 was placed in ICU and was intubated. The attending doctor also reported that R1 had concerning wounds which looked like burns. Hospital documentation revealed that the wound care nurse was consulted and reported that R1 had sustained wounds and bruisings; however, wounds to his bilateral buttocks and right upper thoracic spine areas were observed to be stage 2 pressure injuries, likely from “not being turned”. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, there is sufficient evidence to support that R1’s pressure injuries developed while under facility care due to lack of care and supervision, therefore the allegation is Substantiated. Allegations: Resident did not receive an adequate amount of liquids while in care and Resident did not receive an adequate amount of food while in care. During the course of this investigation, LP obtained and reviewed R1’s hospital records and facility file and conducted interviews with investigatory leads. The outcome of the investigation revealed that upon R1’s arrival to the hospital, R1 was observed to be weak and reported to have sustained multiple falls. Upon admission to the hospital, R1 was diagnosed with dehydration and mal calorie malnutrition. Interviews conducted with facility staff and records reviewed revealed that R1 had not been at his normal baseline for days and/or up to three weeks. R1 was observed with general weakness and changes in his normal behaviors and no longer able to ambulate. It was also reported that several days prior to the hospitalization, R1 was refusing to eat and was “skipping meals” and was bed bound. Based on interviews conducted and records reviews, there is sufficient evidence to support that R1 did not receive an adequate amount of liquids and food while in care. Based on observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An immediate civil penalty will be issued today, in the amount of $500 due to Resident was hospitalized due to staff neglect. At this time, an Enhanced Civil Penalty (ECP) determination is pending in reference to Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) & (f) and may be assessed at a later date. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with the Appeals Rights.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87466Type A

    Observation of the Resident. The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Interviews conducted with facility staff and investigatory leads revealed that R1 was not sent out to the hospital when observed by facility staff not at his normal baseline or a change in condition. Interviews conducted were consistent in stating that R1 was not at his normal baseline for days and or up to three weeks, at which and during this time R1 sustained unwitnessed falls and required higher level of care. R1’s change in medical condition was communicated with his POA/Sister and at the request of the POA, facility staff did not transport R1 to the hospital for further evaluation. Facility staff did not ensure that any changes in R1’s medical and physical condition were documented and brought to the attention of R1’s Primary Care Physician. On 1/3/21, R1 was found unresponsive by facility staff, requiring hospitalization. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 16, 2023 inspection of SAVANT OF BURBANK EAST?

This was a complaint inspection of SAVANT OF BURBANK EAST on August 16, 2023. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SAVANT OF BURBANK EAST on August 16, 2023?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Observation of the Resident. The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, m..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.