Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Villalobos conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. LPA met with Operations Manager Michael Forsgren and the purpose of the visit was discussed. On today's visit , LPA interviewed Staff #1-5 (S1-S5) and Residents #1-#6 (R1-R6) and collected documents related to the facilities resident council meeting. The investigation concluded the following: In regards to the allegation "Staff participated in resident council meeting without resident council approval " it was alleged that S1 participated in the facilities resident council meeting without approval. (5) of (5) staff interviewed denied the allegation. (6) of (6) Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews show that R1 is the president of the resident council and R1 invited S1 to attend the meeting on 3/9/23. Interviews with R1 confirms this information that S1 was invited to attend the meeting as a guest prior to it starting. S1 also confirmed the same. Based on interviews and files reviewed; although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87208(a)(5)Type B

    87208.Plan of Operation.(a) Each facility shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation...The plan and related materials shall contain the following:(5) Staffing plan, qualifications and duties.This was not met as evidenced by: S1 borrowed money from R1 and did not return their money. This is against the facilites staff handbook which is part of the plan of operation, and poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care and supervision.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 14, 2023 inspection of WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING on March 14, 2023. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING on March 14, 2023?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.