Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident's showering needs were met. It is alleged that staff refused to assist R1 with a shower as R1 could not shower during scheduled time due to a family visit, staff also allegedly refused to assist with shower the following day as well. LPA interviewed 4 staff and each denied the allegation, stating that residents have a shower schedule and if they are needed with an additional shower one will be provided when as long as a caregiver has the availability. LPA interviewed 8 residents and 6 out of 8 residents denied the allegation and stated they have never been refused assistance with showers by staff. Allegation: Staff threatened resident. It is alleged that that 2 residents were informed of R1’s allegations against staff and threatened R1 and stated to keep S2’s name out of R1’s mouth. LPA interviewed 4 staff and each denied the above allegation, S2 stated that they never speak with residents regarding other residents issues and believe that residents overheard R1 when R1 was shouting at S2 about their showering. Interviews with staff also revealed that R1 was verbally aggressive towards staff and residents which made staff uncomfortable when left unattended with R1 and R1 was then placed on a two person assist when bathing. LPA interviewed 8 residents and 7 out of 8 residents denied the allegation, and stated they have never felt threatened by staff. Allegation: Staff retaliated against resident for reporting. It is alleged that R1 is being retaliated against as they have reported to upper management their concerns and feel staff (S2) are now refusing to assist with showers. LPA interviewed 4 staff and each denied the allegation, S2 stated there was not a refusal however since R1 had been aggressive towards staff there was an adjustment made to R1’s showering where R1 will need a 2 person assist. LPA interviewed 8 residents and 7 out of 8 residents denied the allegation and stated that they have never felt retaliated against by staff. Allegation: Staff wrongfully evicted resident. It is alleged that R1 is being evicted as S3 has asked R1’s sister to remove belongings and R1 has no where else to go. LPA interviewed 4 staff and each denied the above allegation, interviews with S1-S3 reveled that R1 was never evicted and had voluntarily discharged from the facility and was placed in a board and care of their preference. LPA interviewed 8 residents and each denied the allegation and stated they have never been evicted or issued an eviction noticed. R1 stated that while hospitalized they asked to be sent to a board and care and they voluntarily left the facility and are now at a now facility of their liking. Continued on LIC9099-C Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, and review of client files, and LPA observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview held and a copy of report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This standard was not met as evidence by: Per Interviews with 4 staff and 8 residents each confirmed the above allegation stating that the elevator was in disrepair for weeks during the month of October 2025. Invoices for repairs were also provided.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 17, 2025 inspection of WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING on November 17, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WHITTIER GLEN ASSISTED LIVING on November 17, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.