Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

FIL-AM HOME FOR SENIORS IIILicense 1986032182 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA obtained resident roster and names of staff. LPA asked facility for LIC500, and facility staff stated they would email it later today. LPA interviewed four staff (S#1- S#4), six residents (R#1-R#6) and two witnesses (W#1-W#2). Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from sustaining severe fractures while in care. It is alleged that resident sustained fractures while in care due to facility Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision. The investigation revealed: LPA Interviewed four (4) staff S1-S4 and four (4) of four (4) staff denied the allegations. LPA interviewed six (6) residents R1-R6 and six (6) of six (6) residents could not collaborate the allegation. Administrator denied that facility caused fractures, and three (3) of three (3) staff stated they were unaware that resident had facial fractures. According to Department interviews, and records reviewed, resident was admitted to facility on 05/01/2022. On 11/26/2022, resident was found to be lethargic and unresponsive. Facility called 911 and the resident was transported to Pomona Valley Hospital. At the hospital, evidence of facial fractures (Right orbital lateral wall fracture, right zygomatic arch fracture) was documented on hospital records for admission date of 11/26/2022. Based on supporting evidence, facility failed to provide proper medical attention, and the facility provided inadequate care and supervision that caused unexplained injuries while under care and supervision of the facility. There is sufficient evidence to substantiate this allegation. Allegation: Staff did not prevent resident from sustaining pressure injuries. It is alleged that staff did not prevent resident from sustaining pressure injuries while in care. The investigation revealed the following, LPA Interviewed four (4) staff S1-S4 and four (4) of four (4) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed six (6) residents R1-R6 and six (6) of six (6) residents could not collaborate the allegation. Administrator denied that resident developed pressure injury while at the facility. Administrator stated that resident arrived at facility with pressure injuries. (CONTINUED) According to Department interviews, and records reviewed, resident was admitted to facility from nursing home on 05/01/2022. Discharge paperwork from the nursing home documents a stage 1 pressure injury on each heel and sacrococcyx blanchable redness. Administrator agreed that resident arrived to the facility as described by the nursing home discharge paperwork. Resident was found to be lethargic and unresponsive on 11/26/2022. Facility called 911, and the resident was transported to Pomona Valley Hospital. While at the hospital, RN documented wound on resident’s buttock midline coccyx: 6cm x 6cm x 0cm (wound had no documented staging, photograph showed area to be redden, not open). RN also documented right foot wound with no documented staging. There was no mention of the left foot in the hospital records. Additional RN staff documented that resident had a “closed stage 3 pressure injury on coccyx and evidence of scar tissue”. Due to facility failing to provide proper care and supervision, resident’s pressure injury on coccyx progressed from blanchable redness to stage 3 during her stay at facility. There is sufficient evidence to substantiate this allegation. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An immediate $500 civil penalty is being issued during today's visit due to the neglect/lack of care and supervision resulting in resident sustaining fractures to face. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator Toby Miclat and a hard copy of licensing report was provided along with appeal rights. . LPA obtained resident roster and names of staff. LPA asked facility for LIC500, and facility staff stated they would email it later today. On 08/08/2023 LPA Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to facility and met with Administrator Toby Miclat and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA took a tour of the living room, dining areas, kitchen, common areas, and random resident rooms. LPA did not observe any signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety risks. LPA requested copies of staff and resident roster, and interviewed four(4) Staff (S#1-S#4) and six (6)residents (R#1-R#6). LPA interviewed four staff (S#1- S#4), six residents (R#1-R#6) and two witnesses (W#1-W#2). Allegation: Staff did not meet residents hygiene needs. It is alleged that facility failed to provide resident with adequate hygiene needs The investigation revealed, LPA interviewed four (4) staff S1-S4 and four (4) of four (4) staff denied the allegation. W1 and W2, who are family members, stated resident had a bad body odor. LPA interviewed six (6) residents R1-R6 and six (6) of six (6) residents could not collaborate the allegation. Administrator denied that facility did not meet resident hygiene needs, and three (3) of three (3) staff stated they provide all residents with proper hygiene needs daily. LPA toured all rooms, all residents were clean, bed linens were clean, and the rooms were free of odors. There is not enough evidence to support this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and copy of report provided to Administrator Toby Miclat

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87608(a)(3)Type B

    87608(a)(3)87608 Postural Supports(a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do for himself/herself. Postural supports may be used under the following conditions.(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order.This requirement is not met as evidence by: LPA observed R1 with double half rails and Administrator stated that the facility did not have a doctor’s order for the half bed rails that were used for R1 and R6 bed which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87464(f)(1)(c)Type A

    87464(f)(1)(c) Basic Services:Basic services shall at a minimum include:(1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).H&S Code 1569.2(c) “Care and supervision” means the facility assumes responsibility for, or provides or promises to provide in the future, ongoing assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by:Based on interviews and record review, resident suffered 2 facial fractures while in care at the facility and facility failed to provide medical attention to resident. Lack of care and supervision by facility resulted in staff not knowing resident had facial fractures. The fractures were discovered when resident made visit to emergency room for unrelated health issues.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87465(a)(1)Type A

    87465(a)(1) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...(1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, facility did not contact PCP or arrange to have wound care specialist provide wound care to resident who was admitted to facility with two stage 1 pressure injuries on both heals and developed stage 3 pressure injury on coccyx while in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 30, 2024 inspection of FIL-AM HOME FOR SENIORS III?

This was a complaint inspection of FIL-AM HOME FOR SENIORS III on April 30, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to FIL-AM HOME FOR SENIORS III on April 30, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87608(a)(3)87608 Postural Supports(a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, and subsequent changes to that a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.