Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 1986032862 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

• New Hire Initial Training Record for S1 • R1 Information Sheet • Physician's Report for R1 • Preplacement Appraisal Information for R1 • Personnel Record for S1 • Staff and Resident. The investigation revealed the following; Allegations: "Staff did not administer medications as prescribed" and "Facility has inadequate staffing for the residents while in care ". The details of these allegations state, R1 called 911 due to experiencing back pain. Once the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived at the facility, S1 reported to EMS personnel that she was the only staff on duty with a census of 36 residents and she was not qualified to administer the necessary medications to R1. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the incident involving R1 took place on 6/27/21, between the hours of 10:35PM - 11:35PM. R1 called 911 because was she experiencing back pain and had not been provided her pain medications. After reviewing the file of S1, LPA discovered that S1 did not have the qualifications and training to administer medications to residents. Interviews conducted corroborated with the information found in the file of S1. In reference to the allegation of "Facility has inadequate staffing for the residents while in care", statements obtained confirmed that S1 was the only staff member on duty at the time of the incident and in charge of providing care and supervision to 36 residents. S2 was scheduled to be on duty with S1 but was a "no call, no show" leaving S1 alone at the facility. LPA learned that S1 failed to inform Management about S2 being a "no call, no show" in a timely manner in order to find a replacement. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegations of "Staff did not administer medications as prescribed" and "Facility has inadequate staffing for the residents while in care". Allegation: " There is a strong odor of marijuana present inside the facility". During the visit conducted on 7/7/21, at 12:15PM, LPA Katrdzhyan toured the facility with the assistance of Assistant Administrator / Alexander Solorio and observed a strong odor of marijuana coming from the hallway, near the dining room area. Based on statements obtained, LPA learned that residents have been o bserved smoking marijuana in their rooms and the outside, near the courtyard area. Based on LPA's observation and interviews conducted, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of "There is a strong odor of marijuana present inside the facility". Based on LPA’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record reviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division & Chapter number), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Assistant Administrator along with the Appeals Rights.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type B

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs.This requirement is not met as evidenced by:After reviewing the file of S1, LPA discovered that S1 did not have the qualifications and training to administer medications to residents. Interviews conducted corroborated with the information found in the file of S1.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type B

    Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities. Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment.This requirement is not met as evidenced by; During the visit conducted on 7/7/21, at 12:15PM, LPA Katrdzhyan toured the facility with the assistance of Assistant Administrator / Alexander Solorio and observed a strong odor of marijuana coming from the hallway, near the dining room area. Based on statements obtained, LPA learned that residents have been observed smoking marijuana in their rooms and the outside, near the courtyard area.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 1, 2021 inspection of PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on September 1, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on September 1, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. In addition to the rights listed in Section 8..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.