Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 1986032862 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joe Katrdzhyan and Luis Mora conducted an unannounced case management visit to this facility. Upon arriving at the facility, LPAs met with Assistant Administrator / Alexander Solorio and were later joined by the Executive Director / Kandice Vergara-Williams who assisted with the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to review the file of Resident #1 and tour the physical plant to ensure residents are not smoking marijuana inside the facility. At 12:15PM, LPA Katrdzhyan toured the physical plant (inside/outside) with the assistance of the Executive Director and did not observe residents smoking marijuana inside the facility. Also, there was no odor of marijuana present inside/outside of the facility premises. After reviewing the file of R1, LPA Katrdzhyan observed that at the time of admission, facility staff did not conduct a proper assessment of R1 as the Care Assessment/Evaluation, Functional Assessment, Mental Status Questionnaire and the Resident Appraisal were incomplete. Most of the answers to the questions listed on the forms were left blank. Also, the Unusual Incident/Injury Reports were reviewed for R1 and it was determined that R1's behaviors changed between period April of 2021 through September of 2021 and facility staff did not update the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan for R1 addressing the current changes . R1 had multiple incidents of not following the facility Guest Policy by sneaking unknown male individuals from the street into her room. R1 was involved in theft of using a card belonging to another resident and making unauthorized purchases. R1 was also involved in multiple incidents of selling drugs to other residents inside the facility and getting into physical and verbal altercations with other residents and staff. R1 is in the process of being evicted from the facility for being non-compliant with facility house rules. The following deficiencies were observed to be in violation of California code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 (refer to 809D) An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director along with the Appeals Rights.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87457(c)(1)Type B

    Pre-Admission Appraisal - General. Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs in comparison with the admission criteria specified in Section 87455, Acceptance and Retention Limitations. The appraisal shall include, at a minimum, an evaluation of the prospective resident's functional capabilities, mental condition and an evaluation of social factors as specified in Sections 87459, Functional Capabilities and 87462 Social Factors.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: After reviewing the file of R1, it was observed that at the time of admission, facility staff did not conduct a proper assessment of R1 as the Care Assessment/Evaluation, Functional Assessment, Mental Status Questionnaire and the Resident Appraisal were incomplete. Most of the answers to the questions listed on the forms were left blank. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87463(a)Type B

    Reappraisals. The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The Unusual Incident/Injury Reports were reviewed for R1 and it was determined that R1's behaviors changed between period April of 2021 through September of 2021 and facility staff did not update the Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan for R1 addressing the current changes. This poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 6, 2021 inspection of PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a other inspection of PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on October 6, 2021. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PASADENA VILLA SENIOR LIVING on October 6, 2021?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "Pre-Admission Appraisal - General. Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for adm..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.