Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

BEVERLY HILLS TERRACELicense 1986033192 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, “Unlawful Eviction”, it is being alleged that a resident has received an eviction notice that was taped on their door upon a resident’s return to the facility. Interviews revealed the following; six (6) residents (R2 through R7) and all four (4) staff (S1 through S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. R1 has stated that they received the document during the evening of 07/02/25. Record reviews have indicated the following: a resident has received a “Thirty day notice to quit premises” (dated: 06/26/25) from “Dennis P. Block & Associates, APC”. Our division, Community Care Licensing (CCL) has not received any notification of any eviction notice related to a resident in question. The dates reviewed and dates provided do not match. This “eviction” does not meet This document has not been signed, nor does it include Title 22, Eviction Procedures 87224(a)(1-4). Interviews have revealed six (6) out of seven (7) (R2-R7) and all four staff (S1-S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not ensure resident receives mail in a timely manner”, it is being alleged that a resident does not receive their mail. Interviews revealed the following: Three (3) residents (R4. R6, R7) have agreed the allegation has taken place, while one resident (R4) is not sure. All four staff (S1-S4) have denied the allegation has taken place. LPA observations revealed the following: On 07/09/25, around 11am, LPA observed the United States Postal Service dropping off residents’ mail. Throughout the day, LPA did observe staff providing mail to residents in care as each resident passed by the front lobby. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated. There have been two (2) deficiencies cited during today's visit. Please see LIC9099D. During today's visit, there have been two (2) deficiencies cited. Please see LIC9099D. An exit interview was held with Cesilia Torres - Assistant Administrator and a copy of facilities' appeal rights, the deficiencies cited, plans of corrections and a copy of this report has been provided. Regarding the allegation, “Staff yell at resident”, it is being alleged that the administrator and other staff yell at a resident. Interviews revealed the following: three (3) out of seven (7) residents (R1, R4, R7) and three (3) out of four (4) staff (S2-S4) have agreed the allegation has taken place, while one (1) resident was not sure. Record reviews have indicated that S1-S4 have met training standards, Title 22, 87411(c)(3)(C) “Personnel Requirements – General” which include “Personal rights” of residents in care. LPA’s observations have indicated that the behavior of staff at the facility respond negatively when addressed harshly by residents in care, which does not meet previous trainings under 87411(c)(3)(C) “Personal rights”. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Please see LIC9099D. Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not safeguard resident's personal belongings”, it is being alleged that a resident is missing multiple personal items. Interviews revealed the following: four (4) out of seven (7) residents (R1-R4) and one (1) staff have agreed the allegation has taken place. Record reviews revealed the following: seven residents (R1-R7) have got personal property inventory within their files, but that they are not kept up to date. According to Health and Safety Code section 1569.153(c), the facility does not keep records of the items missing, as reported from residents. Based on record reviews and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . Health and safety code 1569.313(c) is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Please see LIC9099D. During today's visit, there have been two (2) deficiencies cited. Please see LIC9099D. An exit interview was held with Cesilia Torres - Assistant Administrator. A copy of facilities' appeal rights, the deficiencies cited, plans of corrections and a copy of this report has been provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.153(c)Type B

    1569.153 Theft and loss program; standards, property inventories and surrender of personal effects; secured areas (c) Documentation of...documented theft and loss record(s)...past 12 months shall be made available to the state department of Social Services...in response to a...complaint. This has not been met as evidenced by: based on record reviews and interviews conducted, licensee did not ensure that documentation of items lost or stolen from R1-R4 for the past 12 months were on file which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk risk to clients in care.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities(a) In addition to...87468.1,...the following personal rights: (4) To...supervision, and services...meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in..., and competency...to meet their needs. This has not been met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observations and interviews conducted, the licensee did not ensure care and supervision were delivered to meet R1's personal needs which poses a potential health safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 18, 2025 inspection of BEVERLY HILLS TERRACE?

This was a complaint inspection of BEVERLY HILLS TERRACE on September 18, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to BEVERLY HILLS TERRACE on September 18, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.153 Theft and loss program; standards, property inventories and surrender of personal effects; secured areas (c) Do..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.