Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation consisted of LPA taking tour of facility, interviews with two (2) facility residents, Five (5) staff of the facility, two witnesses (W#1 W#2) and the department interviewed home health nurses. The investigation revealed: Allegation: Questionable Death. It is alleged that facility neglected and did not provide care to resident resulting in resident being admitted to hospital and passing at the hospital. No neglect was reported by the persons interviewed. Five (5) of five (5) staff interviewed denied the allegations and reported sending the victim to the hospital for medical assessment due to nausea/vomiting on 01/06/2024. R1 passed away on 01/23/2024 at the hospital due to complications. Two (2) of two (2) residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Review of R1 Home Health records did not uncover any neglect concerns. No abuse or neglect concerns noted in resident's hospital records. The information and evidence obtained did not sufficiently support the allegation. Allegation: Staff abandon resident. It is alleged that staff took resident to hospital on 01/06/2024 and left resident there, abandoning resident. Five (5) of (5) staff denied the allegation. Two (2) of two (2) residents could not corroborate the allegation. S1 stated that S1 took resident to hospital on the request of daughter after staff discussed change of condition with daughter. S1 stated that daughter stated she would meet S1 at hospital with resident. S1 stated daughter called S1 to informed S1 that daughter was at emergency door and S1 stated that he gave resident to daughter and left the hospital. S2, who is spouse of S1 stated that the facility called daughter about taking resident to hospital and that daughter told facility staff that she was tending to her cat and that was more important to her. S2 stated S1 left resident with nurse at the hospital entrance and stated that daughter had not yet arrived. There are inconsistencies in the statements of S1 and S2, however, no report of abandonment was sent by hospital and there is not enough information or evidence that staff abandoned resident at hospital. (continued) . Allegation: Staff are unable to communicate with resident due to language barrier. It is alleged that facility staff do not speak or understand English and that makes it difficult to communicate. Five (5) of five (5) staff denied the allegation. Two (2) of two (2) residents could not corroborate the allegation. S1 stated that staff understand simple commands. S2 stated that the allegation is not true. S2 stated they live close and that the caregivers meet all the needs of the residents. S3 who was working at facility previously stated she understands English but prefers Spanish. S3 stated S3 met all the needs of residents when S3 was working at facility. S4 stated S4 really does not understand English too well but enough to be able to meet the resident’s needs. S5 stated S5 is new to facility and is able to meet the needs of the residents. LPA interviewed five (5) staff in English and four (4) of five (5) staff were able to answer questions. LPA was present during meal time and 3 residents were served different food, when asked S4 why, S4 explained that one resident is vegetarian and the prefer different meals. The residents appeared clean and well taken care off. The staff present is competent to meet the needs of all the residents currently. There is not enough information or evidence to proof this allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted, review of residents files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, copy of report and appeal rights provided

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 24, 2024 inspection of LA CASITA RESIDENTIAL CARE INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of LA CASITA RESIDENTIAL CARE INC. on September 24, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to LA CASITA RESIDENTIAL CARE INC. on September 24, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.