Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ARS FOUNTAIN HOMESLicense 198603458
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff are inappropriately restraining a client in care. It is alleged that the facility is using an unauthorized physical restraint on R1 that ties R1 to their bed. LPA interviewed 4 staff and 4 out of 4 staff denied the above allegation and stated that they have never used restraints on any of their residents. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 2 out of 3 residents denied the above allegation. R1 stated there was a time that staff would worry over R1 getting out of bed in the middle of the night as the risk of fall was there but they have never been restrained to their bed nor have they observed other residents being restrained in any way. LPA interviewed R2 and it was stated that they believe that R1 at one time was restrained to their bed but could not confirm as they never physically saw the restraint. Interviews with 3 other residents were not conducted due to cognitive impairments. LPA toured R1’s bedroom and looked under mattress around bed and under bed, there were no signs of restraints being any where in room or near R1’s bed. (unsubstantiated) Allegation: Staff are not administering resident's medications as prescribed. It is alleged that the facility staff are using excessive medication on R1. LPA interviewed 4 staff and 4 out of 4 staff denied the above regulation and stated that all medications, supplements and vitamins have a prescription and are administered per the doctors orders. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 3 out of 3 residents denied the above allegation and stated they feel the staff are giving their medication as prescribed and all medication looks the same with no changes noticed or concerns. Interviews with 3 other residents were not conducted due to cognitive impairments. LPA reviewed medication and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and observed the following: MAR was not being documented properly as June 29-30, 2025 and July 1, 2025 were not signed for by the staff that assisted with administering medications each of those days, LPA spoke with S2 and S2 stated they did give the medications per doctors orders, however, they forgot to sign the MAR. LPA o bserved R1’s medication list provided by their doctor, there were PRN medications listed (as needed medication), however, those medications were not in R1’s Medication basket, when LPA questioned S2 about this medication they stated they have not refilled the medication for R1. (unsubstantiated) Although LPA did not find proof of R1 being over medicated, a citation will be issued today (7/8/25) for the missing PRN medication in a separate report via Case Management visit. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Allegation: Staff did not prevent client from losing excessive weight. It is alleged that since R1’s admission in December 2024, R1 has presented with documented weight loss. LPA interviewed 4 staff and 4 out of 4 staff denied the above allegation and stated that since admission R1 has gained a healthy amount of weight as their condition and appetite has improved. LPA interviewed 3 residents and 3 out of 3 residents denied the above allegation, R1 stated they have noticed a bit of weight gain within themself as they enjoy the food at the facility and their appetite has improved. LPA reviewed R1’s Physician Report dated 10/21/24 and additional medical record dated 1/10/25 both had the same weight, during initial visit 7/1/25 staff weighed R1 and LPA compared it to the weight records and it showed a weight gain of 8 pounds. (unsubstantiated) Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, review of R1's files and Medication Review, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(b)Type B

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (b) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is able to determine and communicate his/her need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, facility staff shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration of his/her PRN medication.This requirement was not met as evidence by: During initial visit on 7/1/25 LPA observed all PRN medications that were listed on Medication List, were missing for R1 and it was confirmed by S2 that the medication has not been ordered. During todays visit per S2 all PRN medication has been discontinued, there was no documentation stating discontinuation from doctor.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    87506 Resident Records (a)The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff.This requirement was not met as evidence by: During initial visit on 7/1/25 LPA observed MAR was not being signed for properly as dates 6/29/25, 6/30/25 and 7/1/25 were all missing signatures from S2 who assisted with medications. S2 confirmed medication was provided to residents, however, they forgot to sign.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 8, 2025 inspection of ARS FOUNTAIN HOMES?

This was a complaint inspection of ARS FOUNTAIN HOMES on July 8, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ARS FOUNTAIN HOMES on July 8, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.