Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It is alleged the facility does not have a lot of food on hand and residents are hungry because they have not been fed. Interviews conducted with residents revealed, 4 out of 6 residents stated to be served their meals with a variety of foods and are content with the food and 2 out of 6 residents were unable to provide answers due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff and administrator revealed groceries are purchase once a week and there is a menu which is followed by the staff. During facility’s tour LPA observed adequate amount of food supplies. LPA observed items as follow: in the freezer there was fish, meat, chicken, frozen vegetables. In the refrigerator milk, fruits, turkey, yogurt, vegetables, tortillas, fruits were observed. In the pantry can foods, and dry goods (oatmeal, cereals) were observed. During the visit all residents were at the dining table, one of them was finishing breakfast and the staff prepared lunch which matches the lunch posted on the menu. LPA reviewed the menu posted in the kitchen’s wall. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff member does not ensure that resident participates in activities while in care. It is alleged resident lays in bed all day. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 6 residents stated to have activities throughout the day, like exercises. One of the residents stated all residents have meals together. 3 out of 6 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. Interviews with administrator and staff revealed there is an activity calendar and the residents paint, play bingo, do arts and crafts, exercise, and do celebrations. During LPA’s visits all residents were observed in the dining room upon arrival, finishing breakfast. An activity calendar was posted in the living room and dining room. Pictures of celebrations and arts and crafts were posted around the dining room. LPA observed materials for activities stored in the a cabinet in the dining room. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff members do not treat residents with dignity and respect. It is alleged residents are treated rough while providing care and are being yelled at. Interviews with 4 out of 6 residents stated staff treat them well, are gentle, and respectful at all times. 2 out of 6 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Interviews with staff revealed residents are being treated with respect and have not observed or been reports of staff mistreating the residents while in care. Per administrator staff receive initial training which includes resident rights. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Licensee did not address reported roach infestation at facility. It is alleged there is a roach infestation. Interviews with residents revealed 4 out of 6 residents stated the facility is clean and 2 out of 6 residents were unable to answer due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff revealed there has not been a cockroach infestation at the facility. Per administrator pest control is provided at the facility once a month. During the facility’s tour LPA observed living room, kitchen, dining room, bathrooms, and each residents’ room free of cockroaches. There was no evidence of an infestation under the kitchen’s sink or bathrooms’ sinks. LPA reviewed pest control invoice dated 4/21/25. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Cheryl Dallas administrator and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 22, 2025 inspection of AMELIA ROSE SENIOR CARE COTTAGE?

This was a complaint inspection of AMELIA ROSE SENIOR CARE COTTAGE on April 22, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to AMELIA ROSE SENIOR CARE COTTAGE on April 22, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.