complaint·July 30, 2024

Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed stated that staff are attentive, and check on them often. Residents stated that if a resident fall, staff will assess them immediately. Although resident #1 experienced two falls, on 4/1/24 and 4/2/24, the standard of proof has not been met because the preponderance of the evidence does not demonstrate the facility was in violation of Title 22 regulations. Regarding the allegation that : Staff left a resident on the floor for an extended period of time after falling. The investigation revealed that resident #1 experienced a fall on 4/1/24, and on 4/2/24. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital, and was hospitalized from 4/2/24 -4/7/24. Review of hospital documents indicate that resident #1 sustained minor injuries due to fall(s). Administrator and staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that residents are checked on every two hours, or more frequently according to their care needs. Staff stated that when resident #1 fell, he was found by staff, assessed, and sent to the hospital. Staff stated that resident #1 was not left on the floor for an extended period of time. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed stated that staff are attentive, and check on them often. sw3 Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted and a copy this report was provided.