Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SANTA ANITA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 1986035351 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding allegation: Staff administered the incorrect medication to resident. It is alleged that caregiving staff gave R1 medicine on 7/21/25 at around 8:00 p.m., which is not prescribed to R1 and was told to take it. It is alleged that when R1 told staff the medication wasn’t theirs, caregiving staff told R1 “You gotta take it.” The investigation revealed the following: Interviews with Staff 1 – Staff 6 (S1-S6) revealed, caregiving staff are not allowed to administer medication to residents at any time. S1-S6 stated, the only staff who are allowed and qualified to administer medication are medical technicians per education training, facility policy and procedures. However, interview with S3 (caregiver) indicated, they were asked by S5 to please give R2 (R1’s roommate) a medication as S5 waited outside R2’s room with medication cart during medication pass, due to R1 not allowing S5 to enter R1’s room. S3 stated, they took the cup with a “pink” pill from S5 because S5 asked S3 to please give R2 the medication, even though S3 is aware that only medical technician staff are allowed to do so, which S3 is not. S3 stated, they proceeded to enter R1/R2’s room, and once in the room, S3 placed the cup with the medication on R1’s walker table. S3 stated, the medication was meant for R2 and not for R1 which at that time, S3 was able to retrieve the cup with the medication from R1 and proceeded to give it to R2. S5, denies the allegation; however, record review of R2’s medication administration record (QuickMar) for July 2025 indicates, S5 signed off on administrating R2’s bedtime routine medication at 8:00 p.m. on 7/21/25, which S5 does admit to being the staff who passed R2’s medication on that day. Interview with R1 indicated, S3 gave them the cup of medication with a “pink” pill which they did not take due to medication not being part of their regular routine medication prescribed by their doctor. R1 further indicated, they do not take any “pink” pills with their routine medication and can identify exactly which medication R1 takes, daily. Review of R1’s medication indicated, R1 does not take any medication fitting the description of the pill given to them by S3 on 7/21/25. Further review of R2’s medication revealed, R2 takes medication which includes a pink pill of Rosuvastatin Calcium 20mg tab which was administered on 7/21/25 at 8:00 p.m. by S5. R2 was unable to be interviewed due to being hospitalized at the time of visit. LPA observation, record review, and staff and resident interviews, corroborate the allegation. Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22), is being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(d)(4)Type A

    87411(d)(4) Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance:(4) Knowledge required to safely assist with prescribed medications which are self-administered. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on observation, staff and resident interviews and record review, licensee did not ensure that caregiving staff who are not qualified to administer medication to residents refrain from administering medication to a resident.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 28, 2025 inspection of SANTA ANITA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SANTA ANITA ASSISTED LIVING on July 28, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SANTA ANITA ASSISTED LIVING on July 28, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411(d)(4) Personnel Requirements - General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.