Public Record
Gardenia Garden, Inc
Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.
Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call
About this facility
Operating details and county context
Operating details
- Capacity
- 6 residents
- Phone
- (626) 772-3050
- Address
- 1708 Royal Oaks Dr.
- Licensed since
Los Angeles County context
1,820*CCLD
Total facilities
4.7*CCLD
Avg citations
9.4*CCLD
Avg visits
4.1*CCLD
Avg complaint visits
*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .
Citations
15 citations on record
Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.
What does Type A vs Type B mean?
Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.
Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.
2026
- 87468(c)(2)(A)Type B
Based on observation and staff interview, LPA observed that the RCFE (Residential Care for the Elderly) “Let Us No” Complaint (PUB 475) poster was not posted at the facility which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87458(c)(5)Type B
Based on record review, Resident #6 (R6’s) file did not have documentation of determination for ambulatory status which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87608(a)(5)(A)Type B
Based on record review, LPA observed that Resident #1 (R1), Resident #2 (R2), and Resident#4 (R4) to Resident #6 (R6) had half bed rails and R1, R2, and R4 to R6's file did not have physician's order for bed rails which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87506(g)Type B
Based on record review and staff interview, LPA observed that the Administrator’s file does not have a valid RCFE Administrator’s Certificate which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87608(a)(5)(B)Type B
Based one record review and observation, LPA observed that Resident #3 (R3) had a full bed rail and R3's file did not have a hospice care plan specifying a need for a full bed rail which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87411(c)(1)Type B
Based on record review, LPA reviewed Staff #1 (S1’s) file did not have a Valid First Aid Training which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87506(a)Type B
Based on record review, LPA observed Resident #1 (R1’s) Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of February 2026 was not up to date as initials for three (3) medications were missing initials and was last initialed on 02/02/2026. LPA also observed for Resident #2 (R2’s) MAR for the month of February 2026 was not up to date and not accurate since one medication was initialed from 02/01/2026 to 02/31/2026. LPA observed that Resident #3 (R3) did not have a current MAR in file. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2025
- 87465(c)(3)Type A
Based on observation, record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility does not have the proper Medication Administration Record (MAR) to document the residents' medication which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 87606(b)Type B
Based on observation, record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility currently has 2 bedridden residents but only has fire clearance approved for (1) bedridden resident which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
2024
- 87618(b)(5)Type B
Based on record review,, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the Administrator cannot provide proof of staff training on knowledge and use of the oxygen equipment which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 87618(b)(3)(B)Type B
Based on observation, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that (3) Residents on hospice requiring oxygen on as need basis but facility did not have "No smoking-oxygen in use" signs posted on their rooms which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 87618(b)(3)(A)Type B
Based on interview, record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the Administrator has not reported to the local fire department that oxygen is in use at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 87506(a)Type B
Based on record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the facility did not have a current and complete medication record for all the residents for the month of April 2024 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 87465(e)Type A
Based on record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that PRN medications for Resident #1 did not have written order from a physician which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
- 1569.605Type B
Based on record review, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that the liability insurance policy expired on 03/01/2024 and the Administrator has not renewed the policy which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.
Inspection record
6 visits on record since 2022. Most recent on 2026-02-19.
4 routine inspections.
- Inspection7 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection1 Type A · 1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection1 Type A · 5 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- InspectionNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
15 citations across the record on file
Nearby
Other licensed assisted living facilities in Duarte
FAQ
Common questions about this facility
Is Gardenia Garden, Inc licensed in California?
Yes, Gardenia Garden, Inc is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2022.
How many citations does Gardenia Garden, Inc have?
Gardenia Garden, Inc has 15 citations on record: 2 Type A (more serious) and 13 Type B citations. It has received 6 visits (4 inspections, 2 other visits).
When was Gardenia Garden, Inc last inspected?
Gardenia Garden, Inc was last inspected on February 19, 2026 (about 3 months ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.
What type of assisted living facility is Gardenia Garden, Inc?
Gardenia Garden, Inc is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 6 residents. It is located in Duarte, Los Angeles County, California.
How does Gardenia Garden, Inc compare to other assisted living facilities in Los Angeles County?
Gardenia Garden, Inc has 15 citations. The county average is 4.7 citations per facility. There are 1,820 assisted living facilities in Los Angeles County.
Does Gardenia Garden, Inc have any serious violations?
Gardenia Garden, Inc has 2 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.
Next steps for this record
If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.
Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.