complaint·October 7, 2025

(continued on 9099C) LPA interviewed four (4) staff, and all four (4) staff denied the allegation. S2 denied giving resident any kind of eviction including verbal. S1 stated she never witnessed S2 giving verbal eviction to R1. LPA interviewed Ten (10) residents and ten (10) of ten (10) residents could not corroborate the allegation. LPA reviewed R1 admission agreement, and it showed that R1 was admitted to facility on 02/27/2025 and showed rent amount of $1420.07. The only notices that facility has provided for R1 are overdue rent notices. R1 physician’s report dated 02/27/2025 showed that R1 can make own decisions and does not have cognitive impairment. R1 stated that R1 was not told R1 had to leave facility, but that facility may evict R1 for nonpayment. R1 said R1 offered $1000.00 but administrator refused it. Administrator denied that she refused the $1000.00. Administrator stated R1 asked for copy of R1 admission agreement and that R1 would like time to review it before paying. Administrator stated she will work with R1. R1 stated R1 would be willing to work out an arrangement. R1 stated has only paid $500 since arriving on 02/27/2025. There is insufficient evidence to support this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Stephanie Funderburg and a copy of this report was provided.