Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

ASTORIA PARK SENIOR LIVINGLicense 198603566
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It revealed that staff and med tech would not administer insulin to residents and facility policy did not allow staff to administer insulin to residents since staff were not medical professional. Per observation during medication time, med techs only assisted residents to set up and prepare the medication/insulin. All residents administered insulin by themselves. Therefore, it was not observed that insulin was administered by staff at the facility. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, interviews with staff, residents, review of resident files and LPA's observation, the investigation did not reveal any evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. An exit interview was conducted with Maria Teresita Capito Quizon, administrator. The findings were discussed and a copy this report was provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87413(a)(1)Type B

    Personnel - Operations. In each facility:When regular staff members are absent, there shall be coverage by personnel with qualifications adequate to perform the assigned tasks. This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, it was revealed that in October 2025, 2 Memory Care Unit (MCU) staff were suspended, of which 1 was terminated, but both were listed in the MCU weekly staff schedule and administration staff did not ensure adequate staff coverage. This posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risks to persons in care.

  • 87625(b)(3)Type B

    Managed Incontinence.... the licensee shall be responsible for the following:Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on interviews and observation during the 10/30/25 physical plant inspection, the findings indicate R1 requires incontinence care at least every 2 hours and feces were observed on the floor, bedding, and mattress of a Memory Care Unit resident room. This posed a potential health and safety risk to the resident in care.

  • 87465(h)(6)Type A

    (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:..(6)The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Per medication review, R5 TK has control Rx Pregabalin 150 mg adminsitered twice on 3/14/26 but did not administer on 3/18/26. R6 AT has discontinued Rx-Midodrine HCL 2.5 MG still given to R6 on 3/26/26. R7 SS, has discontinued Rx-Furosemide 40 mg no longer administered but still listed on MAR. Licensee did not have an explanation about Rx discrepancy/ record.Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed.This deficiency was evidenced by the following: Based on interview and record review, staff do not dispense all of R1's medications and R1’s medication Gabapentin 300 mg capsule was marked administered, but the medications were still on the bubble pack and the PRN pain medication was not given as prescribed which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 26, 2026 inspection of ASTORIA PARK SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of ASTORIA PARK SENIOR LIVING on March 26, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ASTORIA PARK SENIOR LIVING on March 26, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.