Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BAYSHIRE SAN DIMASLicense 198603710
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation(s) : Staff neglect resulted in a resident's death – It is alleged facility staff neglected R1 which resulted in R1’s death. Review of R1’s resident records revealed R1 was admitted into the facility on 06/21/2023 and was self-responsible. R1 was transferred from another hospice care provider on 11/04/2024 and new hospice care orders were placed. On 11/05/2024, during hospice care visit, hospice care staff documented R1 requested that medication ordered on 11/04/2024, not be ordered and administered unless “absolutely necessary”. On 11/05/2024, R1’s physician ordered R1 discontinue the use of Morphine Sulfate 10mg/0.5 ml- every 4 hours as needed, Lorazepam 1mg/0.5m- every 6 hours as needed, Morphine Sulfate 20mg/1ml- every 4 hours as needed, Morphine Sulfate 5mg/0.25ml- every 4 hours as needed, Lorazepam 1 tab- every 4 hours as needed. Review of R1’s hospice care notes and facility care notes revealed hospice staff and facility staff regularly documented R1’s care and supervision. Review of R1’s death certificate did not corroborate above allegation. Four (4) out of the four (4) staff interviewed denied above allegation. Four (4) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied above allegation. R1 was not available for interview. Interview with R1’s family did not corroborate this allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . Staff had unauthorized access to a resident's personal funds- It is alleged facility staff were monitoring R1’s financial situation. Review of R1’s resident records revealed R1 was admitted into the facility on 06/21/2023 and was self-responsible. Four (4) out of the four (4) staff interviewed denied above allegation. Four (4) out of the four (4) residents interviewed denied above allegation. Interview with R1’s family did not corroborate this allegation. Review of R1’s facility record, including payments made to the facility for services, did not corroborate above allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies were cited during this complaint investigation visit. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided via email.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 14, 2025 inspection of BAYSHIRE SAN DIMAS?

This was a complaint inspection of BAYSHIRE SAN DIMAS on March 14, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BAYSHIRE SAN DIMAS on March 14, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.