Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

WINDCHIME OF MARINLicense 2168009773 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099: Interviews with 3 staff (S1, S2, & S3) who care for residents on 3rd floor revealed none of them had given R1 a shower/bath, for the approximate 3 weeks R1 was at facility. Interview with R4 revealed protocol is, when a resident is admitted to the facility, staff put them on a shower schedule 2 times a week (unless otherwise requested) and then sign log each time a shower is given or indicate a refusal or indicate refusal in daily notes, which was not completed in this case. There is sufficient information obtained to support that a violation has occurred regarding the reported allegation of "facility staff are not meeting residents’ care needs", therefore, the allegation is Substantiated . Responsible party not notified of resident fall - Reporting party alleges facility did not notify/call responsible party of residents fall until in person, hours later when resident was at the hospital. Incident report received indicates facility was aware at approximately 7:45 am but POA/Responsible Party told in person at 10am when arrived at facility for regular visit. Interview with S5 informed the processes of inputting new resident information: obtain residents information from POA then S5 types it up on Emergency contact forms (attachment #5) & Resident & responsible party information form (attachment #6) etc. then provide to RCD their portions who then implements into their computer system. Documents obtained revealed the Identification document handwritten from the POA is the same on the emergency contact form but on the responsible party information form the last number of the phone number was turned from 9 to 3. S4 typed in the number from the responsible party information which was wrong as indicated on the facility online resident contact number for their POA. 9/11/25 at 10am Progress Notes & Incident report submitted to CCL on 9/16/25 of 9/11/25 incident for R1 indicates Med Tech called POA 3 times starting at 7:45am not getting any answer and finally left a message. Progress notes also indicated S4 notified POA at 10am when they came into the facility to visit. Interview with S1 informed when there is a fall or emergency and they need to contact the family they go to the online information. Investigation revealed S1 called R1’s POA when incident occurred on 9/11/2025 at approximately 7:45am, although they were dialing the wrong number that had been inputted into the computer for the responsible party. On 9/22/25 responsible party informed LPA, they also never received any written notification of incident. Regulation 87211(a)(1)(D) indicates :Reporting Requirements: Each licensee shall furnish ..A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of...(D)Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident. Continue on LIC9099C2 Continued from LIC9099C: There is sufficient information obtained to support that a violation has occurred regarding the reported allegation of "responsible party not notified of resident fall". Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Facility staff not giving prescription medications as prescribed by doctor - Reporting party alleges facility may not have been giving R1 the correct dosages of medications that were prescribed by physician. Facility only had paper Medication Administration Record (MAR) of August for R1 which indicated prescription Rexulti was to be given every AM although does not show was given 8/29- 31/2025. Further review of medications indicated 10 of R1’s daily medications from 8/28-31/2025 were not given consistently. LPA interview with S4 revealed R1 did not have any medication refusals. Interview with Med tech and Administrator informed, with the documents provided they could not confirm medications were provided on said days. As there was no proof medications were provided to the resident, there is sufficient information obtained to support that a violation has occurred regarding allegation Facility staff not giving prescription medications as prescribed by doctor is SUBSTANTIATED . Additionally, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received an incident report on 10/20/2025 indicating on 10/14/2025 while inputting narcotics into new EMAR system discovered R2 had discrepancy in log record. From 8/18/2025 to 10/13/2025 (except on 6 correct occasions) multiple PM med techs had inadvertently been giving R2 PRN Geri-tussin instead of physician ordered routine Guaifen-Codeine. No adverse side effects observed, Responsible party and Hospice physician notified. A finding that the allegations are Substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements:(a)Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...(1)A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of...(D)Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This requirement has not been met based on document review and interviews revealing due to facility writing wrong number of responsible party they were not reached, as well responsible party indicated they never receive written notice of incident report. This is a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87202(a)Type A

    87202 Fire Clearance: (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation during Annual inspection and information... received from Local Fire Department, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not following fire clearance regarding windows and screens resulting in the fire department providing conditional fire clearance until 9/18/2026 or if prior windows and screens fixed to notify CCL & Fire Dept. This is an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(4)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care:(a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above and did not ensure that medication was administered to R1 as required. R2 Incident Report stated that PM Med Tech provided wrong medication ??times. This is an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87464(f)(4)Type A

    87464(f)(4). Basic Services. Basic services shall at a minimum include:...Personal assistance and care as.. indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, …such as dressing, eating, bathing..***Based on documents reviewed and interviews conducted, this requirement was not met as evidenced by: Care report-appraisal for 8/26/2025 indicate R1 was to have 2 showers per week although, there were no shower logs for time frame or notes indicating shower refusals, along with 4 staff interviews indicated R1 not showered 8/26 thru 9/11/2025. This posed an immediate risk to the health and personal rights of R1

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the October 30, 2025 inspection of WINDCHIME OF MARIN?

This was a complaint inspection of WINDCHIME OF MARIN on October 30, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to WINDCHIME OF MARIN on October 30, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211 Reporting Requirements:(a)Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...(1)A written report shall be submi..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.