Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

GREENWOOD ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 216803761
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099 “Staff neglect/lack of supervision resulted in a resident sustaining a serious injury” - Resident 1 (R1) was admitted to the facility in June 2023. Facility reported that on 7/18/2023, R1 had decreased appetite and was having a hard time standing so R1’s Responsible Party was called, came to the facility and had R1 sent to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a left “displaced intertrochanteric hip fracture.” Per interviews with staff, R1 did not have an observed fall, however, 4 of 8 staff interviewed noted R1 complaining of pain, refusing care, and not feeling well on 7/17/2023. Interviews and multiple reports revealed that by 7/18/2023, R1 was complaining of pain and was not able to stand. Per interview and medical record review, R1’s leg was observed to be swollen on 7/18/2023. Review of R1’s medical records dated 07/18/2023 noted that facility staff informed emergency personnel that R1’s leg was observed to be swollen since 07/17/2023. Per report, R1 had complained of hip pain on 07/16/2023 but was observed to still be able to bear their own weight. Review of facility’s 24-hour log dated 07/15/2023 and 07/16/2023, showed staff did not note any changes observed for R1. Facility reported that R1 had an unwitnessed fall on 10/08/2023, which staff responded to when they heard R1 calling for help. Per report, R1 was “visually assessed” by staff because R1 did not want to be touched. Two staff members assisted R1 into their wheelchair and then staff called the Administrator who called R1’s Responsible Party. R1’s Responsible Party arrived at facility and requested that R1 be sent to the hospital. R1 was sent to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a right “femoral neck fracture” per obtained medical records dated 10/08/2023. Review of Facility’s 24-hour log dated 10/08/2023, did not note any changes observed. Review of R1’s Physician’s Report dated 06/08/2023, stated that R1 had a dementia diagnosis, had auditory, visual, and motor impairment, and needed assistance with their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of R1’s Needs and Services Plan, dated 06/24/2023, stated that R1 used a walker and needed help with ambulating and transferring. Review of R1’s Needs and Services Plan dated 06/24/2023, stated that R1 used a walker and required stand-by assistance with ambulating and transferring. Staff interviews conducted reported that they do not look at or have access to resident files and rely on facility management to inform them of resident care needs. Facility staff were unable to identify fall interventions to mitigate R1’s risk for falls. Interviews stated that interventions with R1’s Responsible Party were discussed but nothing was put in place. Review of facility records showed no indication that a care conference was held or that a reappraisal was completed . Review of Facility’s documentation indicated that in the event of a fall or post-fall assessment, staff are to report, access for serious injury and current condition, obtain fall history, assess environment, assess future fall risk, and analyze the fall and create a post fall action plan. Review of Facility’s Program Plan for “Policy and Protocol for Emergencies” stated the following: “Any and all medical emergencies that require assistance will be handled by first calling 911, notifying the resident’s physician, following with communication with the family or responsible party. Continued on LIC9099C Continued from LIC9099C Some items that would be a medical emergency and 911 would be called are, but not limited to the following; expected heart attack, expected stroke, resident found unconscious, their breathing is compromised, seizures, uncontrolled bleeding, falls, etc.” This allegation is Substantiated . “ Staff did not assist residents in a timely manner ” – Reporting Party stated that they have observed staff sleeping on the facility premises while on duty and have seen staff not responding to residents when they call for help. 3 of 4 staff interviews conducted stated that they had not observed or seen staff sleeping during facility hours. 1 of 4 staff interviews conducted stated they have seen staff members sleeping while on duty. 2 of 2 Resident interviews conducted stated that they have pressed their pendants multiple times before they received a response from care staff. Wait times were reported to be between 20 minutes to an hour. During a Department visit conducted on 11/28/2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) staff observed that it took 16 minutes for care staff to respond to Resident 2’s (R2’s) pendant call and that they had pressed their pendant about 5 times. CCL staff were informed by the responding caregiver that they were unable to respond to the resident due to doing laundry and helping someone in the bathroom. CCL staff noted that while waiting for care staff to respond to R2’s pendant call, they observed one caregiver cleaning the dining room, one caregiver escorting a resident out of the dining room, and one caregiver walk past R2’s room. This allegation is Substantiated . Based on the Department’s interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A finding that the complaint allegation is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiencies, on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. **An immediate Civil Penalty in the total amount of $500 has been issued for a violation that resulted in the sickness or injury of a resident in care (See LIC-421IM) An additional civil penalty may be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), 1568.0822(e) or (f).** Exit interview conducted. Plan of Corrections reviewed and developed with Licensee and Administrator. Copy of report, LIC9099-D, LIC-421IM, and Appeal Rights discussed and provided to Licensee and Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 27, 2024 inspection of GREENWOOD ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of GREENWOOD ASSISTED LIVING on March 27, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to GREENWOOD ASSISTED LIVING on March 27, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.