Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

There is an allegation unqualified staff administered injectable medications to resident . Staff interviewed described the various methods they use to assist resident with medications, including liquid medications from syringes. Administrator requires staff to take a medication quiz to confirm completion of medication training module. One of the questions on the quiz reflects, ”Which of the following should you do before assisting the resident with their medications.” Based on a review of staff training records, all staff who assist in the administration of medications have the required training per regulation. Based on LPA interviews, record review and observation although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. LPA obtained information regarding procedures of Coumadin Clinic at facility. The clinic would call the facility when they received the results and tell S1 or S2 over the phone what dosage instructions to follow prior to the next blood draw. The staff would write it on a post it note and set up the medication according to those directions. R1 would receive Coumadin dosage based on those directions until the next time the Coumadin Clinic would draw labs. The standing MD order and instructions on the medication bottle only stated "Coumadin 5mg- take as directed. Documentation revealed facility did not keep record of weekly dosage of Coumadin per physician/nurse advising after blood draw results reviewed. There is no evidence R1 had access to medications or medication was missing. This will be addressed in a case management. LPA attempted to contact treating physician for 10/15/2020 hospitalization on 4/5/2021, 4/13/2021, 4/28/2021, 5/26/2021 and 6/19/2021 to distinguish if cause of hospitalization was the result of overmedicating R1 or an accumulation of Coumadin in R1’s system. Medication Administrator Records (MARs) for October 2020 reflect Warfarin (Coumadin) 5mg take as directed. Kaiser Medication list indicates Warfarin (Coumadin) 5 mg oral tab Take as directed by Coumadin Clinic or physician. Order was effective as of 4/2/2020. Hospitalization documentation dated 10/15/2020 reflects a diagnosis of Anticoagulant Overdose, Accidental, init ICD-10-CM T45.511A. Documentation also reflects reason for transfusion -urgent reversal of Warfarin. Interview with outside party on 6/23/2021 indicated…in general it would be very difficult to determine from labs whether high lab values are due to an excessive dose of Coumadin versus accumulation. LPA asked about ICD 10 code. Outside party indicated the word "overdose" is not a term used in the medical field, it is a reference code. There are so many different contributing factors that affect lab values…LPA attempted to interview R1’s Primary Care Physician on 4/26/2021. Physician refused to give LPA any information regarding R1. Based on LPA interviews, record review and observation although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. (See LIC 9099-C)

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211Type B

    Reporting requirements

    87211 Reporting Requirements. The licensee shall send a written report, within seven days, to the licensing agency and the person responsible for the resident when a resident incurs any serious injury while under facility supervision or death. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s records review and interviews conducted Licensee did not ensure that CCL was notified when R1 was taken to the emergency room and admitted into the hospital which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87465(a)(7)Type A

    87465 (a)(7) Incidental Medical and Dental Care. (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. (7) When requested ... a record of dosages of medications which are centrally stored shall be maintained. Based on LPA observation/interview/record review this requirement was not met as evidenced by: Community Care Licensing (CCL) requested documentation related to R1's medication, specific dosages of medication were not documented. This is an immediate risk to the Health, Safety and Personal Rights of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 24, 2021 inspection of ASSISTED LIVING OF NAPA VALLEY-HAMILTON?

This was a complaint inspection of ASSISTED LIVING OF NAPA VALLEY-HAMILTON on June 24, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ASSISTED LIVING OF NAPA VALLEY-HAMILTON on June 24, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.