Complaint·June 16, 2025

Based on LPAs observations, interviews and information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6 is being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted with AD Martha Crawford and a copy of this report along with LIC 9099D and appeal rights were given at the time of inspection. The text message was sent on December 28, 2024, the same day as the reported fall. The text message also revealed that on December 28th, 2024 S1 informed R1s responsible party that they contacted ambulatory services and that R1 was being transported to the hospital. S1 informed LPA that the fall happened around 3pm ambulatory services came after 3pm and then they informed R1s responsible party while the paramedics were here via text message at 4:28PM. Based on LPAs observations, interviews and information gathered during the investigation and review of all documents obtained, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met, therefore the above allegations are deemed UNFOUNDED. Meaning that the allegations facility did not report unwitnessed falls to authorized representative and facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. The department therefore dismissed the complaint. An exit interview was conducted with AD Martha Crawford and a copy of this report was left at the facility.