Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

personnel were not concerned with any sexual abuse following an examination and tests completed 11/06/2021. Upon R1’s return to the facility, the facility Administrator submitted a SOC 341, Abuse Report, on 11/09/2021. The report CA00761273 referenced an investigation completed by California Department of Public Health in regard to Chapman Global Health Center. On 1/11/2022, the Department received an email from public health indicating “The department was unable to substantiate the complaint allegation and found no violations of the regulation.” Interview conducted with Administrator on 12/02/2021 indicated Public Health investigator was advised by Chapman Global Medical Center that R1 had Thrombocytopenia which can cause the resident to bruise easily. Two (2) of two (2) Caregivers interviewed stated that R1 is known for self injurious and wandering behavior. Both caregivers interviewed deny seeing any staff work with R1 in a rough or aggressive manner. R1’s family member denies any concern with care at the facility. The investigation did not produce evidence and information to support an allegation of physical abuse. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted with and a copy of this report was provided to facility.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Care and supervision as defined by statute and rules

    Basic services shall at a minimum include:Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Codesection 1569.2(c). This requirement is not being met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, Licensee failed to ensure R1 was provided care and supervision. R1 eloped out of the facility and was discovered by Starbucks staff approximately .9 miles away. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 4, 2022 inspection of KARLTON RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER?

This was a complaint inspection of KARLTON RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER on May 4, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to KARLTON RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER on May 4, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.