Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

3K HOME CARELicense 3060006385 citations on this visit
5 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On this day with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert met with Licensee Maria Manimbo for the purpose of conducting a case management deficiency visit regarding complaint control number 22-AS-20250805140648. During the investigation the following deficiencies were observed: A solvency audit was conducted of the facility finances for the period of July 2024 to June 2025. Per the review, the Licensee’s net profit did not take into account salary and wages in cash to the employee and was therefore determined to be unreliable. Review of the Operating costs determined the licensee did not maintain sufficient cash reserves to cover any unforeseen expense for all twelve months reviewed. The Department reviewed the Balance Sheet (LIC 403) for June 2025. Per review, $83.99 cash was in the financial institution and $11,450 was reported in current assets. The current assets reported were personal valuables, which the Department is unable to verify. The LIC 403 Balance Sheet listed $8,420.19 in liabilities. The balance sheet analysis shows that the working capital available for June 2025 is $83.99 in assets minus $8420.19 in liabilities with a working capital loss of -$8,336.18. Negative working capital indicates a company does not have enough current assets to cover short-term financial obligations. Bank statements were obtained for the period of July 2024 through June 2025. Per review of facility finances, withdrawals exceeded deposits by $6,361.82 in July 2024, and $9,495.47 in June 2025. In addition, it was determined the Licensee did not have a separate business account and has comingled funds with their personal bank funds. In September 2024 and June 2025, there was a negative ending balance, which indicates the facility did not have enough funds to cover its expenses. (Continued on LIC 809-C) (Continued form LIC 809) Six months of utility bills and monthly lease payments were reviewed. While gas statements show the Licensee made payment in March and June 2024, telephone bills show payments were made late for all six months, which resulted in late fees. Electric, water and trash bills were provided every two months. Past due disconnections notices were sent on February, April and June 2024 billing statements. Monthly property lease payments for a twelve-month period were reviewed and the licensee made late payments for ten of the twelve months resulting in the licensee paying $1,450 in late fees. Based on bank statements, utility bills, and facility records reviewed, it was determined the facility does not have sufficient cash reserve to cover operating expenses for one month and the licensee does not have a financial plan that complies with CCR Title 22 Section 87213, Finances. During August 11, 2025 visit to facility, LPA observed Resident 1 (R1) file. Upon review, R1’s Admission Agreement on file was missing last page of R1’s original Admission Agreement containing R1’s signature was missing from file. During the investigation, text messages between R1 and the Licensee were obtained, asking for cash advances. LPA obtained text messages between R1 and the Licensee, asking for cash advances. R1’s Admissions Agreement stated rent is due by the 27 th of the month. A screenshot of R1’s cell phone on April 28, 2025, states the Licensee provided the 1 st Payment to a loan; taken from the resident. Prior to June 4, 2025, Licensee texted R1 for an advance for the month stating Licensee needed $2,000 for a referral fee for another resident. A screenshot on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, shows R1 wired $4,500 to Licensee’s bank account. Thus, R1 paid $6,500 for rent on June 2025 ($2000 + $4,500) before the 27 th of June. Another text screenshot, on July 7, 2025, requests another advance for an undisclosed amount of money. The Licensee currently acts as the facility Administrator and has an administrator certificate which expires on April 26, 2027. Despite this, they did not ensure the facility was in accordance with regulations and established policy, program and budget resulting in insufficient funds maintained and the Licensee borrowing funds from R1. (Continued on LIC 809-C1) (Continued from LIC 809-C) The following deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 Division 6. An exit interview was conducted with Maria Manimbo, Licensee and a copy of this report, LIC9099-D, and appeal rights were provided at the conclusion of the office meeting.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.657(a)Type A

    For any rate increase due to a change in the level of care of the resident, the licensee shall provide the resident …written notice of the rate increase … The notice shall include a detailed explanation of the additional services to be provided at the new level of care and an accompanying itemization of the charges. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Dept. record review, observations & interviews the licensee did not provide a written notice of a rate increase detailing additional services to be provided at new level of care

  • 87207Type A

    False Claims. No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Dept. record review, observations & interviews the Licensee claimed R1 required a higher level of care resulting in an increase of fees from $3500 to $6500. No increase in level of care was documented as required. This poses an immediate risk for residents in care.

  • 87205(a)Type B

    Accountability of Licensee Governing Body. The licensee..., shall exercise general supervision over the affairs of the licensed facility and establish policies concerning its operation in conformance with these regulations and the welfare of the individuals it serves. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Department record review, observations and interviews, the Licensee failed to maintain a budget in accordance with regulations and ensured facility compliance with Title 22. This poses a potential safety and personal rights risk for residents in care.

  • 87213Type A

    Finances. The licensee shall have a financial plan that conforms to the requirements of Section 87155, Application for License, and that assures sufficient resources to meet operating costs for care of residents; shall maintain adequate financial records;…This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Dept. record review, observations and interviews the licensee failed to pay utility bills timely on multiple occasions and comingled Licensee’s personal funds and facility operating funds resulting in a negative working capital. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87405(h)(1)Type B

    Administrator – Qualifications and Duties The administrator shall have the responsibility to: Administer the facility in accordance with these regulations and established policy, program and budget. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Department record review, observations and interviews, the Licensee borrowed money from a resident; co-mingled funds and failed to maintain a budget in accordance with regulations. This poses a potential safety and personal rights risk for residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(8)Type A

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities… residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To be free from…, financial exploitation,… This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on Dept. records reviewed, observations & interviews, Text messages between Licensee and R1 confirm Licensee required advance payments from R1 on multiple occasions to help fund facility operations. This poses an immediate personal rights risk for persons in care.

  • 87507(d)Type B

    Admission Agreements (d) The licensee shall retain in the resident's file the original signed and dated admission agreement... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Department record review and interviews the licensee did not retain the original signed and dated Admission Agreement for R1. During records reviewed, the last page of R1’s original Admission Agreement containing R1’s signature was missing from file. This poses a potential personal rights risk for residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 29, 2026 inspection of 3K HOME CARE?

This was a other inspection of 3K HOME CARE on January 29, 2026. 5 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 3 Type B.

Were any citations issued to 3K HOME CARE on January 29, 2026?

Yes, 5 citations were issued (2 Type A, 3 Type B). The first citation was for: "For any rate increase due to a change in the level of care of the resident, the licensee shall provide the resident …wri..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.