Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Routine inspection

LOTUS SENIOR CARE, HUNTINGTON BEACHLicense 30600403712 citations on this visit
12 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nancy Guillen made an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a required annual Inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry by caregiver Hendrick Catayas after explaining the purpose of the visit. Administrator (AD) Rita Lee was notified and assisted via telephone. LPA observed the Administrator Certificate was current and expires July 31, 2026. This is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed to six non-ambulatory residents, of which three may be bedridden, with a hospice waiver for four. The facility is a two-story home. The first floor consists of five resident bedrooms, three resident bathrooms, a family room, dinning room, kitchen and garage. The second floor is for staff and consists of three staff bedrooms, one bathroom and a vanity room. During the inspection, LPA and caregiver Hendrick Catayas toured the inside and outside of the facility, common areas, resident rooms, kitchen, garage and observed the following:LPA observed residents watching television in their respective rooms and sitting in the dinning table. LPA observed five residents in care and two staff present. LPA observed the See Something Say Something Poster (PUB 475) mounted on the wall by the entrance to the facility. LPA observed knives to be located in an unlocked drawer in the kitchen; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. All resident bedrooms had the required furnishings. LPA observed four out of five residents had bed rails with no doctor’s orders present at the facility; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Resident 2 had a camera in his bedroom; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. LPA observed all resident beds had linens and blankets with additional linens stored in Room 1. LPA observed bathrooms were clean and equipped with grab bars and non skid floor mats. LPA observed all windows were appropriately screened. Bathrooms were observed to be free of debris and mildew, faucets and toilets were tested operational. Water temperature tested between 110.8 and 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. LPA toured the outside of the facility and observed outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. LPA observed the backyard had a shaded sitting area with furniture for resident use. Continued on 809C LPA observed the facility had a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations. Smoke detectors tested operational, however a carbon monoxide detector was not located at the facility; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged with a service date of February 20, 2025 and located in the family room. Gas stove, microwave, washer, and dryer were all inspected and observed to be operable. Toxic chemicals, cleaning solutions, and disinfectants were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents under the kitchen sink. Medication cabinet was observed to be locked and centrally stored in the kitchen however, PreserVision and Iprat-Albut was being administered to residents without a doctor’s order present at the facility; a deficiency was cited on this date. LPA observed the First Aid Kit had all the required components. LPA observed the facility conducted their last emergency disaster drill on August 2, 2024; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Liability insurance was not present at the facility; a Technical Violation was given on today’s date. LPA began review of the records. LPA reviewed five resident records. One out of five records reviewed was missing a Physician’s Report and an admissions agreement and three of the five records reviewed were missing negative TB tests; deficiencies were cited on today’s date. LPA reviewed three employee records. All employee’s present have a criminal record clearance and were associated to the facility. However, all staff CPR certifications were observed expired ; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Two of the staff present today did not have a negative TB test present at the facility; a deficiency was cited on today’s date. Based on the observations made during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights was left at the facility.

Citations

12 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.618(c)(3)Type A

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of three staff files which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 1569.695(c)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care. Last disaster drill was conducted on August 2nd, 2024.

  • 87303(e)(2)Type A

    Based on water temperature reading, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of three resident restrooms, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. Two resident restrooms measured 125.6 degrees Fahrenheit.

  • 87309(a)Type A

    Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care. Knives were located in an unlocked drawer in the kitchen accessible to residents in care.

  • 87411(f)Type A

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above due to TB test not present in two out of three staff files which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87458(c)(1)(A)Type A

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of five records reviewed which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care. (In records for Resident 2, 3, and 4).

  • 87465(h)(1)(C)Type B

    Based on medication review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of five resident's medications, which poses a potential health risk to persons in care. (R1,R2,R4))

  • 87468.2(a)(1)Type B

    Based on observation and interview of caregiver, the facility utilizes a camera in one out of five bedrooms and is not providing R2 a reasonable level of personal privacy which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87608(a)Type B

    Based on observation , the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in four out of five residents which poses potential health and safety risk to persons in care. Bed rails did not have a doctor's orders available for review during visit.

  • 1569.311Type B

    Based on observation and staff interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Carbon monoxide could not be located at the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87506(b)(10)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of five files reviewed which poses a potential health risk to persons in care. Resident 1 missing a Physician's Report.

  • 87507(c)Type B

    Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of five records (R1) reviewed which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 7, 2025 inspection of LOTUS SENIOR CARE, HUNTINGTON BEACH?

This was a inspection inspection of LOTUS SENIOR CARE, HUNTINGTON BEACH on March 7, 2025. 12 citations were issued: 5 Type A (serious) and 7 Type B.

Were any citations issued to LOTUS SENIOR CARE, HUNTINGTON BEACH on March 7, 2025?

Yes, 12 citations were issued (5 Type A, 7 Type B). The first citation was for: "Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of three staff files which..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a inspection inspection. inspection inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.