complaint·July 22, 2024

Document review revealed emotional outburst and property destruction were some of R1’s challenging behaviors. Regarding the allegation: Client blamed for employees quitting by administrator wife. 4 of 5 individuals interviewed denied the allegation. All the staff interviewed denied any staff quit because of Resident 1 (R1). 4 staff denied R1 was blamed for staff quitting. Three staff members stated the former staff who left, found a better opportunity. S1 said the former staff left for the DMV or something. Staff 4 (S4) said the former staff didn’t want to continue in this line of work and thinks the former staff is working a county job. Document review revealed a former staff member resigned for a better opportunity. Staff 3 (S3) stated another former staff member left the facility to pursue the military because the staff was young and wanted to do different things. S3 also revealed the former staff who left for the military left after R1 moved out. Based on the information gathered during the investigation through interviews and document review, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred; therefore, the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated.