complaint·February 17, 2026

During the visit on 02/25/2025 LPA Mendivil witnessed a conversation between Licensee/Administrator Connie Lumauig asking R1’s family about a medication that the Licensee was no longer giving R1. Per LPA’s observation R1's family denied stating that R1’s medication was discontinued. LPA Mendivil questioned Licensee regarding the discontinuation of medication and asked if a physician discontinued, Licensee stated “no” Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through observations the allegation that the facility is not dispensing medication as prescribed is determined to be SUBSTANTIATED , meaning the complaint allegation as valid and that a violation has occurred. Based on above findings deficiencies are being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 Divison 6 chapter 8, An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Interviews with 3 out of 3 staff stated they follow all care plans and they are able to meet residents needs. Based on interviews with 2 out of 6 current residents stated their needs are being met. LPA Mendivil was unable to interview 4 residents are they were not oriented to time and space. LPA reviewed hospice records provided for R1's needed assistance with wound care, medication administration, bathing, and restroom assistance. Licensee stated they met all of R1's needs. Therefore based on the preponderance of evidence through interviews and records reviewed the allegation that facility staff not following resident's hospice plan is determined to be UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies noted. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.