Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CAMBRIDGE COURTLicense 306004761
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Facility staff did not ensure the resident's medication is being administered as prescribed And Facility staff mismanaged the resident's medication The department conducted a records review of resident's Medication Administrator Record (MAR) which showed that the facility administered the medication as prescribed. Therefore, the allegations facility staff did not ensure the resident's medication is being administered as prescribed and the allegation facility staff mismanaged the resident's medication is unsubstantiated. Facility did not provide the medication log to the responsible party as requested LPA reviewed messages sent between Resident #1(R1s) responsible party and facility Executive Director (ED). Per text messages on 10/25/2024, R1s responsible party received the medication log from the facility for R1. Therefore, the allegation facility did not provide the medication log to the responsible party as requested is unsubstantiated. Facility did not inform the representative of the missing medication The department conducted a review of Resident #1 (R1s) most recent Medication Orders from the Skilled Nursing Facility R1 previously resided at. The resident had four separate orders for the medication Vancomycin HCI Oral Capsule 125MG. One order was for 10 days with a start date of 10/08/2024. Another order was for seven (7) days and to be taken on Monday, Wednesdays and Saturday with a start date of 11/02/2024. The last two orders were for seven (7) days. One with a start date of 10/25/2024 and the other with a start date of 10/18/2024. The department cannot prove or disprove if the medications were started on those set dates and/or if the facility received those medications. Therefore, the allegation facility did not inform the representative of the missing medication is unsubstantiated. Based upon the information obtained during investigation, the above allegations are unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted a copy of the report and appeal rights were mailed to the facility .

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 24, 2026 inspection of CAMBRIDGE COURT?

This was a complaint inspection of CAMBRIDGE COURT on March 24, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CAMBRIDGE COURT on March 24, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.