Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

ANAHEIM CROWN PLAZALicense 306005316
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Allegation: Staff did not give resident personal belonging It is alleged a resident #1 (R1) left their walker, wheelchair and luggage at the facility and the facility stole R1’s walker, wheelchair, and luggage. It is alleged the R1 has tried communicating with the facility regarding the whereabouts of their belongings and the facility will not answer or return their phone calls. Based on record review, R1’s admission agreement stated they were admitted to the facility on January 23, 2025. R1’s LIC621 was left blank and does not list a wheelchair, walker, or luggage. On November 21, 2025, R1 wrote a 30-day notice that they were leaving the facility on December 31, 2025. The facility move out form was filled out and signed by R1 stating that R1 has returned the keys, removed all of their belongings and cleaned the room, and all remaining belongings can be donated/disposed of. In a handwritten letter by R1 dated December 29, 2025, R1 stated R2 could have their suitcase, recliner chair, small table with chair, 43-inch TV, and miscellaneous stuff. There is no mention of R1’s wheelchair or walker to be in care or given to R2. Based on interviews, Staff #1 (S1) stated that prior to R1 leaving the facility, that R1 signed that all belongings were accounted for. S1 stated that the R1 did not ask the facility to watch over their stuff or come into agreement to hold onto R1’s belongings. S1 has not been contacted by R1 about the situation with their belongings. S2 stated they were contacted and explained to R1 that they left the facility on their wheelchair. S1 and S2 stated the resident left the facility on their wheelchair. Based on observation, LPA did not observe R1’s wheelchair, walker, or luggage in the facility. Based on information gathered, there is no sufficient evidence to corroborate the above allegation. Allegation: Staff did not provide resident with comfortable accommodation It is alleged R1’s mattress was uncomfortable and that it made their back hurt. R1 complained to staff about the mattress, however, staff did not address the matter. Based on interviews conducted, two out of three residents and two out of two staff denied the allegation. One out of three residents confirmed the allegation. Two out of three residents stated they have not heard issues about a mattress causing back pain for R1. R2 stated they recall R1 having back pain but does not recall R1 stating a faulty mattress caused it. Continued on LIC9099C S1 stated that if any resident requested a new mattress or reported a problem with the mattress, the facility would replace it and provide a new mattress. S1 stated that the Licensee told them that they replaced R1's mattress, but could not provide the record of when it was replace. Based on record review, there is no record of R1 communicating the faulty mattress prior to written correspondence on November 21, 2025, and December 3, 2025. Based on observation, LPA observed R1’s mattress was in good condition. There was no issues showing that the mattress was faulty or in poor condition. Based on information gathered, there is not sufficient evidence to corroborate the above allegation. Based on records review, interviews, and observations, LPA did not find sufficient evidence to support the above allegations Staff did not give resident personal belonging and Staff did not provide resident with comfortable accommodation.. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted a copy of the report was provided to Administrator Gerardo Rodriguez.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 11, 2026 inspection of ANAHEIM CROWN PLAZA?

This was a complaint inspection of ANAHEIM CROWN PLAZA on May 11, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ANAHEIM CROWN PLAZA on May 11, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.