Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MAINPLACE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 306005636
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During their interview, two of two staff stated the pharmacy delivers medication to the facility and in the event a resident needs a ride, they can notify staff and rides are offered on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Regarding allegation, Staff did not ensure resident was transported to doctor's appointment, the following was revealed: It is alleged R1 missed a doctor’s appointment due to a mix up in scheduling transportation. During their interview, R1 denied missing a doctor’s appointment and stated staff take them to necessary doctor’s appointments. Five of five additional residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated the doctor comes to visit them at the facility or facility staff will make arrangements. Per R2, the facility also offers rides on Tuesdays and Thursdays. During their interview, two of two staff stated there was an isolated event in which R1 did not notify staff of their appointment. Per both staff, had staff been aware of R1’s appointment, they would have been able to transport them to their appointment and stated rides are also offered on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Regarding allegation, Staff did not ensure residents room wasn't in disrepair, the following was revealed: It is alleged that upon move-in, R1’s room was not ready and still in the process of being remodeled and R1 did not have water or a sink for a few days. During their interview, R1 stated that upon moving into the facility, there were boxes all over the room because it was still being painted, and their television did not work. Resident 4 (R4) and R1 moved into the facility on the same date and were placed in rooms directly next to one another. During their interview, R4 denied anything in their room being in disrepair upon moving in, including their television. Four of four additional residents interviewed denied their room being in disrepair upon moving in and stated their television has been and continues to be operable. During their interview, two of two staff denied having any knowledge of anything in R1’s room or any other resident’s room being in disrepair upon moving in. Regarding allegation, Staff yell at resident, the following was revealed: It is alleged an unknown staff member yelled at R1. During their interview, R1 stated that after staff refused to transport them to the pharmacy, “one lady” looked at them and stated they could “walk over there.” R1, however, was unable to identify the individual or any other staff alleged to have yelled. Five of five additional residents interviewed denied personally being yelled at by staff and denied witnessing or having any knowledge of any other resident being yelled at by staff. Per R3, “on the contrary. They are very friendly and very helpful.” During their interview, two of two staff denied personally yelling or having any knowledge of any other staff yelling at a resident. (Cont. LIC9099-C) Regarding allegation, Staff did not safeguard resident’s food, the following was revealed: It is alleged an unknown staff member threw R1’s food away, which was placed in a facility fridge. During their interview, R1 was unable to confirm or deny the allegation and stated the only food they eat is what is provided by the facility. During their interview, R3 stated that at mealtimes they “eat everything on [their] plate” and have never had leftovers or food that needs to be safeguarded. Four of five additional residents interviewed stated they are provided with meals by the facility and if they have leftovers, the facility provides leftover containers, and they are able to bring them to their bedroom and eat them at their own discretion. Two of two staff denied having any knowledge of staff not safeguarding any resident’s food. Due to allegations being uncorroborated during interviews conducted, the Department is unable to determine if Staff were refusing to transport resident to pick up prescriptions, if Staff did not ensure resident was transported to doctor's appointment, if Staff did not ensure residents room wasn't in disrepair, if Staff yell at resident, or if Staff did not safeguard residents food. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided at the end of the inspection.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 13, 2026 inspection of MAINPLACE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MAINPLACE SENIOR LIVING on March 13, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MAINPLACE SENIOR LIVING on March 13, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.