Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PARK VIEW ESTATESLicense 3060057981 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Per the video, S1 was observed pulling on R1’s leg at approximately 5:16 AM. Prior to pulling on R1’s leg, R1 can be seen in video being repositioned and moving freely without any evidence of pain or discomfort. Following the interaction, R1 began to continuously yell in pain. Despite R1’s yelling, S1 can be heard repeatedly instructing R1 to stand up and to stop yelling. As R1 grabbed onto bedding, S1 was observed yanking R1’s hands free in an effort to force her to stand up with the assistance of a walker which resulted in R1 sliding from the side of the bed onto the floor at 5:18 AM. S1 picked up R1 from by the waist and attempted to placed R1 on the bed again. When R1 reached out and placed a hand in front of them on the bed, S1 was observed forcibly shoving R1 from the back, face first onto the side of the bed with R1’s legs hanging over the edge of the bed. At 5:22 AM, S1 was observed grabbing R1 up by the ankles and lifting R1 off the floor and onto the bed. During this time R1’s full body weight can be observed resting on their head and neck. Throughout the incident R1 repeatedly yelled in pain and screamed for help. At no time during the incident did S1 call for assistance with R1. After attempting a second time to force R1 to stand, S1 was joined by R1’s responsible party at 5:25 AM who requested S1 to stop while they called for other caregivers to assist. At 5:34 AM S1 was joined by another caregiver who completed R1’s incontinence care with the help of R1’s responsible party. The facility staff did not call 9-1-1 or consult R1’s primary care physician. R1 was later taken to Orange County Global Medical Center for evaluation by their responsible party on 10/02/2021 where R1 was diagnosed with a right inferior ramus fracture. Although the age of the fracture could not be determined, during R1’s hospitalization for an unwitnessed fall on 9/24/2021, a pelvic x-ray was completed and no mention of any pelvic injury was noted by the treating physician. Per documents reviewed and interviews conducted, it was confirmed R1 was listed as a known fall risk. R1 is listed as having a diagnosis of Dementia and requires full assistance with ADLs. R1 was confirmed to be unable to communicate details of incidents that occurred on 9/24/2021 and 9/30/2021. Interviews with interviewees concluded that although R1 was screaming “Help me, help me” while being assisted by S1. During the investigation, it was concluded that S1 was untruthful while providing answers and only told the truth after becoming emotional when shown photographs from the video captured. S1 was hired by the facility via a temp agency to assist with staffing shortages. S1 was observed not to be associated to facility at the time of incident and no required paperwork, including staff training, was observed on file. S1’s contract with the facility has since been terminated. CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE... Based on the preponderance of evidence gathered through multiple interviews and documents obtained; the allegation “Resident sustained injury due to a fall or improper care” has been met; Therefore, the allegation listed above is deemed to be SUBSTANTIATED. The facility is being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by Community Care Licensing Division as per Health & Safety Code 1569.49 An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Heather Myers, and a copy of this report, along with LIC9099-D, Appeal Rights, and the LIC 811, identifying confidential names was left at facility.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type A

    87468.1 (a)(1) (Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities) (a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(1)To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons.CONT BELOW... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on videos reviewed and interviews conducted, the licensee failed to ensure R1’s personal right were not violated as on 9/30/21, S1 was observed yanking on R1’s extremities and shoulder while assisting with ADLs. CONTINUED NEXT SECTION...

  • 87355(e)(2)Type A

    87355(e)(2) Criminal Record ClearanceAll individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c). CONTINUED BELOW... This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on records reviewed, the licensee failed to ensure S1’s criminal record clearance was transferred to the facility for associated. This poses an immediate safety risk to persons in care. AN IMMEDIATE CIVIL PENALTY OF $500 IS ASSESSED.

  • 87412(a)Type A

    87412(a) Personnel Records:The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information...This requirement is not met as evidence by: CONTINUED BELOW Based on interviews conducted, the licensee failed to ensure S1’s personnel records were retained on site. This poses a potential safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87465(a)(2)Type A

    87465(a)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care:The licensee shall provide assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs. This includes transportation which may be limited to the nearest available medical or dental facility which will meet the resident's need. This requirement is not met as evidence by: CONTINUE BELOW... Based on video reviewed, the licensee failed to meet medical needs of residents after failing to seek medical attention after R1 was observed continuously yelling in pain while being assisted by S1. R1 was transported to the hospital via their responsible party two days later. CONTINUED NEXT SECTION...

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 22, 2022 inspection of PARK VIEW ESTATES?

This was a complaint inspection of PARK VIEW ESTATES on March 22, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PARK VIEW ESTATES on March 22, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 (a)(1) (Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities) (a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.