Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

PARK VIEW ESTATESLicense 3060057981 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099 Regarding the allegation that Staff do not meet a resident's catheter needs while in care , the following has been concluded: Per a review of resident R1's transitional information gathered prior to R1's move-in on October 30, 2024 as well as a review of R1's physician report and pre-admission appraisal, it is indicated that R1 moved into the facility with a foley catheter already in place. The transitional information indicates that the resident's plan of care calls for the foley bag to be emptied once it reaches a third to a half of its full capacity. Based on photographs provided by witnesses dated January 14, 2025, there have been instances during which the foley bag was not emptied timely as foley bag appeared to be almost full at the time of the photograph being taken. Another instance of the catheter bag not being emptied overnight was found upon a review of R1's chart for May 2025. R1 had a documented history of urinary tract infections prior to their admission at the facility, therefore it is unsure whether the catheter management is related to any active infection occurring. Per statements made by facility staff during the initial investigation visit, an in-service regarding catheter care and perianal care was conducted after the incidents evidenced above. As a result, the allegation is found to be Substantiated, meaning that based on the evidence gathered during this investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. A corresponding deficiency is being cited on the attached form LIC9099-D. An exit interview was conducted with facility staff. A copy of the report along with appeal rights were provided. CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099-A Regarding the allegation that Staff do not meet a resident's incontinence need while in care , the following has been concluded: On February 25, 2025, R1 attended an appointment with their urologist for a scheduled replacement of their catheter bag. Upon arriving at their health care provider's office, the resident was found to be in soiled diapers. Per the caregiver's assessment on the day of the visit, peri care was provided on the morning of the appointment prior to the resident being brought out to the dining hall, where she was then directly picked up by family, it is therefore not possible to establish whether the diaper was soiled due to insufficient intervention from facility staff. Regarding the allegation that S taff are not meeting a resident's medical needs while in care , the following has been concluded: an interview with R1 along with a review of R1's resident records demonstrated regularly scheduled medical appointments. Incidents such as a fall occurring in December 2024 were also adequately reported to the resident's primary care physician. Additional charting notes and transmission records were provided for a hospitalization event that occurred in April 2025. There is therefore insufficient evidence to show that facility staff is failing to meet the resident's needs. As a result, both allegations listed above are found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that while the alleged incidents may have occurred, or the concerns may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations took place. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type B

    Per CCR 87468.2(a)(4) on Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities, residents are entitled: "To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs". This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the reviewed plan of care, the investigation evidenced insufficient catheter care provided to R1 by facility staff. This constitutes a potential risk to the health, safety and personal rights of individuals in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 13, 2025 inspection of PARK VIEW ESTATES?

This was a complaint inspection of PARK VIEW ESTATES on May 13, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PARK VIEW ESTATES on May 13, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Per CCR 87468.2(a)(4) on Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities, residents are entitle..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.