Public Record
Britta Care
Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.
Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call
About this facility
Operating details and county context
Operating details
- Capacity
- 6 residents
- Phone
- (714) 630-4791
- Address
- 106 S Jeanine Way
- Licensed since
Orange County context
1,105*CCLD
Total facilities
3.4*CCLD
Avg citations
7.3*CCLD
Avg visits
2.1*CCLD
Avg complaint visits
*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .
Citations
18 citations on record
Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.
What does Type A vs Type B mean?
Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.
Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.
2025
- 87463(a)Type B
Based on file review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in six out of six residents which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87412(a)(11)Type A
Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one of three staff, R3, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 1569.605Type A
Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 1569.618(c)(3)Type B
Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of four staff, R2-R4 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 1569.625(b)(1)Type B
Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in review of two out of two personnel files which R2 and R3 did not meet their 40 hour trianing which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87355(e)Type A
Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in two out of three staff, R2 and R3, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87458(c)(1)Type B
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in three out of six residents, R2, R4, and R5, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2024
- 1569.625(b)(2)Type B
(2) In addition to paragraph (1), training requirements shall also include an additional 20 hours annually, eight hours of which shall be dementia care training, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626, and four hours of which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions , and hospice care as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, Staff 1 (S1) and (S2) have not completed the trainings. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 1569.618(c)(3)Type B
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. LPA observed that two of two staff have expired cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) cards.
- 87468(c)(2)(A)Type B
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 1569.625(b)(2)Type B
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87456(a)(2)Type A
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. LPA observed that two of six resident records did not have a pre-admission appraisal and/or the pre-admission appraisal was blank.
2022
- 87705(f)(2)Type A
Based on observation, the facility did not ensure that six out of six resident pill box organizers, staff medications, and bug sprays were locked and inaccessible to the residents which poses an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
- 87355(e)(2)Type A
Based on observation and interviews of Administrator and staff, the facility did not ensure one out of two staff was associated to the facility as required prior to employment which poses an immediate Health, Safety or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
2021
- 87608(a)(5)(B)Type A
Based on LPA's observation, the Administrator did not comply with the section cited above in that LPA Martinez observed full bedrails on bed of R1. Staff report R1 is not on hospice. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87468.1(a)(2)Type A
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Facility does not have COVID precaution/policy posted at facility entrance or throughout facility. LPA was not screened at entrance, no sign in policy in place, visitors are not screened, no papertowels in bathrooms, and no hand washing guidelines posted in bathrooms. This poses a potential health and personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87465(h)(2)Type A
Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA observed unsecured medications (2 bottles of Mucus Relief Chest and an Inhaler in R1's room.This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.
- 87618(b)(3)(B)Type B
During the visit, LPA observed R2 and R3 have Oxygen machines present in their room and there are no "Oxygen in Use" signs present on their door. This poses a potential risk to the health and safety of the residents in care.
Inspection record
6 visits on record since 2021. Most recent on 2025-10-30.
4 routine inspections.
- Inspection3 Type A · 4 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- OtherNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- Other1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection1 Type A · 3 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection2 Type ARead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection3 Type A · 1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
18 citations across the record on file
Nearby
Other licensed assisted living facilities in Anaheim
FAQ
Common questions about this facility
Is Britta Care licensed in California?
Yes, Britta Care is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2020.
How many citations does Britta Care have?
Britta Care has 18 citations on record: 9 Type A (more serious) and 9 Type B citations. It has received 6 visits (4 inspections, 2 other visits).
When was Britta Care last inspected?
Britta Care was last inspected on October 30, 2025 (about 7 months ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.
What type of assisted living facility is Britta Care?
Britta Care is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 6 residents. It is located in Anaheim, Orange County, California.
How does Britta Care compare to other assisted living facilities in Orange County?
Britta Care has 18 citations. The county average is 3.4 citations per facility. There are 1,105 assisted living facilities in Orange County.
Does Britta Care have any serious violations?
Britta Care has 9 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.
Next steps for this record
If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.
Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.